Why the fuck didn't they give his spaghetti-o's? Come on, man. It's his last meal.
51Reply
deleted
· 9 years ago
There was the really good general guy or something in a war who saw his troop hiding because of enemy snipers, and he stormed around and yelled telling them to get up because 'They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist-' (Side note: That was when he died)
Yes, but those people are people that did things too terrible to be allowed to live any more. Killing innocent people for fun for example. They're people that deserved to die. If some maniac murdered my family for fun, then I sure as heck would not want them just sitting in a prison with free health care and 3 meals a day and such. I would want them to pay for their crimes. The death penalty isn't used too often. Just for people that will never ever be anything other than horrible, sick, twisted, people. For those that don't deserve life.
Well most of them would probably be in solitary confinement which is probably worse than death.
▼
deleted
· 9 years ago
I agree with grandpagif. If the person who murdered someone had "murderer" on their criminal record, then wouldn't it make since to have the person who operated the death have murderer go on their record, too? Murder is murder. Period. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Think of it this way: you can have a serial killer killing say 10 people when they get out of prison, or you could get rid of them for their crimes, kill one person and save ten. For an exaggerated version, if you had the choice to kill Hitler, would you not? You can make a "sacrifice"and kill someone, or you can have that person being a drag on society for longer. And by the way, it isn't just one person that executes people on civilized prisons. If it's a firing squad, there are at least 5 different shooters, some with blanks, some with live rounds. If it's the electric chair, some switches are not hooked up. Nobody knows who actually made the person die, so no one person could have murderer put on their record, which is an incredibly stupid thing to suggest to begin with.
deleted
· 9 years ago
You just compared a old Indian lady who killed 5ish people to a bastard who killed 7 million
A life of relative comfort with 3 square meals a day and gyms and free internet? No, these people do not need those things as "punishment" for killing or torturing others
1
deleted
· 9 years ago
Internet? Sweetheart I don't know where you live but in America our inmates get no technology.
I live in America. Even if they don't get any tech, which I don't believe, fact is they still only receive boredom as punishment. Not enough for killing someone
*there. If you don't know simple grammar, how can I trust you know anything about prison life? And unless you interviewed a large sample of them, or experienced it yourself, you have no right to say that.
deleted
· 9 years ago
ooh haha grandpa I found the grammar nazi before youuu
You're right. This is a good example of stupid people in the world, namely you. Executing murderers is a great idea because it permanently removes terrible people from society and protects the public and keeps us from having to make so many super max security prisons.
"Hows this for a headline, 'French fries'"... the dudes name was James French, he was executed through electric chair. thats a funny murderer right there XD
46
deleted
· 9 years ago
Could've been a successful comedian if he didn't choose that kind of life xD
I have a book of last words (I'm not morbid... What are you on about?...) and one of them is some guy talking about a new type of gun, his last words were "here's one you've never seen before!", he then accidentally killed himself with the gun
Comments