Makes sense

Why isn't this the philosophical dinosaur

Pornography requires intent for it to be porn. Clinical photos of children for the sake of police reports on abuse, for example, do not count.

same would go for masterbating right?

no because the baby is not masturbating or having sex? Am I missing something lol

Okay this creepily implies that the poster conciders every photograph of a child pornography.

No wtf

Yeah...ultrasounds really seems child porn...everybody get sexually excited with that

This literally makes no sense. They don't correlate at all.

So when you give birth, technically the baby inside of which implies you are having intercourse with the baby

When you give babies a bath, aren't you technically molesting a child?