Then it's high time for him to retract or update his books. He was so close to getting things right, but he messed up nonetheless. Reading his books was anticlimactic; it was almost like general semantics, but not, and it just does not match reality. Cannot blame him, though, any closer and it wouldn't be a religion but just science. Too bad he is sticking to the 'religion' (vaguest meaning possible) bit of his philosophy.
Comments