That’s what the post means. Those posts are always originally posted by very anti-gay people/groups.
Plus. It’s implied. If they didn’t just mean a man and a woman, why make the post w/ just that example? Why not also have a man and a man and a woman and a woman?
They just said it is marriage not that the rest cannot be.
Plus. It’s implied. If they didn’t just mean a man and a woman, why make the post w/ just that example? Why not also have a man and a man and a woman and a woman?
Bo Burnham