If the healthcare market wasn't propped up by federal dollars, it wouldn't be a problem.
Thankfully, President Trump is trying to rectify that.
Also, accusations do not equate guilt. I could "allegedly" be a murderer who kicks puppies for fun, that doesn't mean I am.
If they wanted to fix our health care system, they would make it universal just like every other first works country
And alleged doesn't mean innocent either, Oj Simpson was an alleged murderer and bam look at that, he did murder
(I'm pretty sure it's not as alleged either when there's a video of him bragging about "grabbing them by the pussy" and pushing himself on married women)
Universal Healthcare is not what America needs, we simply need accountability.
Your point on O.J. does nothing to defeat my own.
In that private conversation, Trump was referring to how eager some woman are to throw themselves at billionaires. And where's the proof that he's ever pushed himself onto married woman? Or is it "alleged" by another unverified anecdote?
@famousone and my point isn't defeated by yours.
When he literally brags about throwing himself on women, I think it's safe to say he did. There's at least 20 accusations of him sexually assaulting women as well, even coming from his ex wife.
You don't have a point. Alleged crimes don't count for shit. Not unless the accused has a history of weaseling there way out (line Capone or Clinton), at least.
.
You mean a well-known rich public figure has been accused? And I'm positive none of them were just looking for publicity or settlements. And I'm absolutely positive none of the accusations were politically motivated.
And I know for a fact that no ex-spouse has ever tried to unjustly discredit their former partner before.
Let's say John Doe murders your mother, but someone with a grudge against me swears up and down that I did it. Does that mean I killed her?
Are you even listening to yourself anymore? Your argument does not have a leg to stand on.
It does mean something though, alleged doesn't mean guilty or innocent. There's equal possibility for both, but if you recognize her could be innocent, you should also recognize he could be guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty.
Barring extreme circumstances, it's the only fair and sensible way to regard accusations.
And there isn't equal possibility. Unfounded and disproved accusation far outnumber substantiated and proven ones. That's why we have due process, why the rights of the accused are a thing, and why burden of proof lies with whoever is accusing.
This isn't rocket science.
Thankfully, President Trump is trying to rectify that.
Also, accusations do not equate guilt. I could "allegedly" be a murderer who kicks puppies for fun, that doesn't mean I am.
And alleged doesn't mean innocent either, Oj Simpson was an alleged murderer and bam look at that, he did murder
(I'm pretty sure it's not as alleged either when there's a video of him bragging about "grabbing them by the pussy" and pushing himself on married women)
Your point on O.J. does nothing to defeat my own.
In that private conversation, Trump was referring to how eager some woman are to throw themselves at billionaires. And where's the proof that he's ever pushed himself onto married woman? Or is it "alleged" by another unverified anecdote?
When he literally brags about throwing himself on women, I think it's safe to say he did. There's at least 20 accusations of him sexually assaulting women as well, even coming from his ex wife.
.
You mean a well-known rich public figure has been accused? And I'm positive none of them were just looking for publicity or settlements. And I'm absolutely positive none of the accusations were politically motivated.
And I know for a fact that no ex-spouse has ever tried to unjustly discredit their former partner before.
Are you even listening to yourself anymore? Your argument does not have a leg to stand on.
Barring extreme circumstances, it's the only fair and sensible way to regard accusations.
And there isn't equal possibility. Unfounded and disproved accusation far outnumber substantiated and proven ones. That's why we have due process, why the rights of the accused are a thing, and why burden of proof lies with whoever is accusing.
This isn't rocket science.