@guestwho Which BLM leaders advocate killing cops or riots? Or did the quotation marks indicate it wasn't actually leaders, just some idiots referring to #blm?
.
@flowerkiller "If you don't condemn those who use your movement to harm others, your silence speaks louder than any approval could" - you're right of course. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=blm+leaders+condemn+police+shootings
.
@frostbite "I've seen praises of the killers from people who consider themselves part of BLM" - Charles Manson considers himself a part of the hippie movement, you know, these love and peace guys.
.
"It is sad." - no shit

It couldn't be manX because what he wrote made sense.

You're not supposed to do anything but when its clearly you who got super triggered in the first place, maybe that's not what you should try and tease others with. Unless you wanna look like helluva dope. In this case: Check.
.
Hm... maybe you really don't get it... ok, just because my reply is under your post, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm answering to your post. In my first posting in this thread I didn't.

As opposed to what?

About 20 years of experience working as import/export merchant on a mid to upper managerial level in four different trades, all of which traditionally dominated by men. Also more than 20 years experience as customer in all kinds of radio shack and home depot like shops.
.
Kind of ironically there's one (1) field of work where just in recent years women get actually favored: as STEM academics.
.
Also lot of info on that subject: www.theguardian.com/money/2016/apr/26/women-job-search-hiring-interview-tips-finalist

"How would I be triggered if I made the joke and you responded?" - keep telling yourself that Mr. "@funsubstanceuser okay then? You know that I'm just joking right? I don't understand why I can't make a joke without you flipping the fuck out and saying "don't do this because x and y". Fuck that." ... uhm... ok? Why so eppy? When I was clearly just poking pokey, you felt oh so lured to play victim. Don't you wish now you'd just shut up?

Who is butthurt? You just don't get my way of having fun. Thats offensive. I'm triggered. Wait no... apparently you are...

Well, actually stupidity DOES hurt, it just doesn't hurt the stupid.

You know that wikipedia is not like an encyclopedia, right? That it's interactive and people are actively discussing its content? Is it a recommended SINGLE source of information? Probably not. So?

Usually, when a woman is hired for a "man job" she needs to be far more qualified to get the job than it would take for a man.

"This is why you never cite Wikipedia as a source." - yea, unless you got half a brain at least, do a tiny little bit of research aside of wikipedia (i.e. the sources of an aricle) and apply a little common sense. So yea, some people really should not cite wikipedia as a source...
.
Using the above extraordinary master skills, it appears the whole thing is a fake, so maybe you shouldn't use funsubstance as source for criticizing wikipedia...

And exactly that happens all the time. For example a lot of drugs are mainly if not only tested on men, rarely on women. Quite a few physical differences are ignored in medical training. Doctors (male and! female) take more time for their male patients. That's what you meant, right? How sensitive!

In any possible meaning of the word: you're a tool.

Basically all social behavior has been developed as result of evolutionary processes. That is why the essence of all religions is pretty much equal. The differences are mainly the way they distribute power and how they protect the have-it-alls from the havent-got-shits.

"A good portion of the world's leading scientists Are Creationists!" - You are an idiot. That's not meant as an insult, but purely descriptive. It's observable and verifiable, it's science, bitch!.
.
As to this little "historic vs. observed science" shtick: "This attempt to divide science in two—historic and "observed"—combined with the attempts to effectively erase the past and limit the sorts of questions that scientists can ask, results in a completely incoherent mess." - from http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/02/dear-creation-museum-all-science-is-historical-science-heres-why/

This kind of ignorant attitude makes me go fuckin nutz. Same like "atheism is also just a religion", that really pulls my trigger.

The fuck does it matter whether you "respect" something that you have no fucking clue of? Science is not about belief. Hardly any scientific theory is as widely accepted among peers as evolution, and your "not believing in it" deserves about as much respect as if you didn't believe in fucking gravity, because bollywood movies prove the theory wrong. This is not exactly a discussion on a level playing field, so yeah, really, we can leave it at that..

Ugh... that "really" hurts me.

Not if you cannot tell the difference to real rhino horns. Best way to prove its real would be the dna test.

Yea dude, I'll show you proof, whatever, just relax dude...
.
<invisible to forda> hey will someone call the school nurse please? And maybe... security?</invisible to forda>
.
yea, "fam" it's all good, just relax. I'll get you proof...

Why would I provide proof for something I never said? Where did I say there were men gathering, calling themselves meninists and take political, meninist action? What they do instead is deny male privilege and threaten women who they identify as feminists to rape them. Uhm, anonymously, on the internet, cause they're whiny little pissboys, of course.