How about just keeping it shut when you don't know jack about a topic? How is that so hard?

"For a religion that's been around for thousands of years, one generation's worth in time is not worth throwing a fit over. " - First of all its not even around 2000 years. Then clearly there's the time before shia vs. sunna and a time after. Mohammed founded islam about 610 and died 632. The events taking place after his death only caused open aggression and thus separation of the islam community in the 650s, thats another twenty years later. The beginning of islam and the escalation of shia/sunna conflict are completely seperate from each other. There may have been underlying conflicts, but the schism of islam was another period. To deny that is like saying the 2nd world war and the korea war are practically the same, because its just a few years after.
.
To just ignore all that and deny plain and simple facts is what Trump does every trumping day, so I will use his name as an insult whenever the trump I find it appropriate. Trump y'all.

The beginning is Mohammed coming down this mountain and founding islam. The separation of shia and sunna took place one generation after he died. To insist you got that right is trumpish. All I'm saying. Now go ahead and call me names.

Yea, you don't see the point, I know that, because it's so apparent.

The word "Shia" derives from the arabic "Shīʻatu ʻAlī" which translates as "Followers of Ali". The shia followers were of the opinion, that late (!) Mohammed's rightful successor was his son-in-law Ali, which brought them into conflict with other followers of the late (!) Mohammed, who preferred another successor and denied the suggestion, that Mohammed personally named a successor at all. So how could there even be followers of Shia when Mohammed was still alive and well, when coming down that mountain?
.
Where exactly did you study "Islam and it's history"? At Trump University?

So could you please elaborate on the actual meaning of your "rhetorical" figure "since Mohammed came down from the mountain", please?
.
You still haven't googled what shia islam is and when it first occurred and what the name means and shit, have you?

"What in hell are you even yapping about now?" - the simple and easily verifiable fact that shia islam followers are those who believe that Mohammeds son-in-law was his righteous successor. As in "Mohammed was dead at that time and didn't come down any mountain then".

The 5 nanogram limit is _very_ low, but yeah, that's basically how it should be treated.

Dude, if you were at least as smart as a wet loaf of Wonder Classic White, you'd have quickly googled what shia islam is and WHEN it occured, before even corroborating that bullshit. Aaand... here we are.

@barbaragordon - its handled absolutely comparable, see https://www.codot.gov/safety/alcohol-and-impaired-driving/druggeddriving/marijuana-and-driving
.
Also interesting: http://norml.org/library/item/marijuana-and-driving-a-review-of-the-scientific-evidence - however, even most stoners agree that you shouldn't drive under the influence because they underestimate their abilitiy to drive safely. As opposed to the well known effects of alcohol.

"The Sunnis and Shiites have been fighting each other since Mohammed came down from the mountain. " - Kids say the darndest things...

Yea, the german chaos.... exclusively found on FOX News. If you came here you'd really have to look hard for it.

A pathological liar who is also a psychopath doesn't always know he's lying, and doesn't really care if anyone knows he's lying. He lives in his own version of reality, and kind of can't help it, when he's blowing his top. Who would be perfectly described by that?
.
A neoliberal liar is just doing his job and has a concept of reality and truth and lies. I find that about equally annoying, but a lot less scary.

Which is exactly my point. They do what they know to be working. And victim shaming does, because it's totally common.

Not quite exact I'd say, its directed at people of a lower class or in any way "below" you.

Then why do you think it's kind of his job?

Kind of ironic that I'm the one breaking it to you: that's a joke, not a science paper.

Right. But WHY does it work so well?

http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/ offers a point of view rarely seen in "normal" media. In case you're interested in that topic.

"any police are "the police" to normal human beings" - Yea, right, like foreigners, christians, republicans, men, women.
.
Seriously, are you still having fun doing this and getting this done to you? I mean, this is a place to have fun, isn't it?

Exhilaration and fun? Not even once...