Because, you know.... Science ftw! 16 comments
jimcrichton
· 7 years ago
Micro/nanoencapsulation is really cool! Difficult to pull off... but really cool!
6
Good people Good vibes 31 comments
jimcrichton
· 7 years ago
I'd like to see a calculation of the statistical likelihood of each of these events occurring at a given moment.
8
$1 pillow fight 3 comments
Spicy 4 comments
God bless Star Trek 23 comments
A Dandelion preserved in resin 5 comments
I need your Help ... What to tell him? 9 comments
I'm never going to need it 10 comments
The 3 theories of time travel 13 comments
jimcrichton
· 7 years ago
If these are the only options, fixed timeline. I reject multiverse theory on Occam's razor grounds. Dynamic timeline is logically unsound. However, fixed timeline (at least as presented in this graphic) seems to require a guiding force of some sort, which I would also reject on Occam's razor grounds.
Any theory of time first requires an explanation of the apparent broken symmetry of time ie. the so called "arrow of time". Sure, an entropic explanation is convenient but remember that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is statistical, not absolute, it leaves some unsettling questions unanswered in this context.
2
·
Edited 7 years ago
Any theory of time first requires an explanation of the apparent broken symmetry of time ie. the so called "arrow of time". Sure, an entropic explanation is convenient but remember that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is statistical, not absolute, it leaves some unsettling questions unanswered in this context.
The more you know. . 5 comments
The 3 theories of time travel 13 comments
Technologies that disappeared 3 comments
jimcrichton
· 7 years ago
I've always thought that the inertial dampers should be able to handle sudden loading more gracefully.
1
Do socks have holes in them 1 comments
jimcrichton
· 7 years ago
Topologically speaking, undamaged socks have zero holes. A sock is a surface of genus 0.
5
You little shit 7 comments
