What is your opinion on using a computer to practically create a voice? Vocaloids are basically pre-recorded vocal clips of a syllable or less that people use to make beautiful songs, such as Circus-P's 'Lie', Neru's 'Lost One's Weeping' and Total Objection's 'Remote Paranoia'. Completely terrible stuff can be made too, but that's the same with anything, from a guitar to the Unity engine.

Are you sure you can't eat a baby? I'm pretty sure I did that once.

Oh, also, of course the temperatures are estimates; you can't very well stick a fucking thermometer in a chunk of 500-year-old ice and say that the ambient temperature was about 0°C, not to mention the fact that there's always a margin of error in any measurement.

I was going to apologise for calling you scum, but now I see that you actually deserve it. Alas, you have cursed me to join you in ad hominem arguments.
My rage was not violent, but indignant. My "belief system," if it can be called that, amounts to nothing more than what seems to have the greatest amount of scientific evidence and I am willing to change my opinions when more reliable, peer-reviewed research is brought to my attention. Also, while I'm not terribly offended, I'd hardly call Asperger's Syndrome a mental health issue when it's both diagnosed and as mild as I have it; instead merely a condition. Stop being so fucking patronising when you know nothing about the person you're addressing (though I guess I'm being a hypocrite now, aren't I?).

Ice samples can be taken and analysed for oxygen content, allowing for estimation of ambient temperature when that ice froze. Other methods also exist, but I'm too angry to think of what they were right now. I'll admit to not actually giving a source for that information, but you've not even taken the main point of the sentence into consideration. You speak of not knowing what the midpoint is, but the rate of change is only affected by a midpoint if it's not in an isolated system, like a kettle with the lid off. Annual mean temperatures increasing at a ridiculous rate and an unknown all-time mean temperature have a very strenuous connection, if one at all. Now, if you'll excuse me, my phone is dying and I'm shaking with rage so hard that I can barely type.

Or rather a substance that is a shade not previously made, given that they're chemists.

Scientists have changed their opinions over the decades as their methods and information have changed, and any report you see today claiming that climate change is a falsehood will have been cherry-picked by either scientists undeserving of the title, or the corporations paying for their 'studies.'
The oceans are becoming more acidic, coral reefs are bleaching, glaciers and ice caps are melting at a rate observable on a yearly basis, and you have the nerve to say this is natural? This evidence and that which was given by others above (some even with sources, rather than an IB student's memory in the middle of the night) is what scientists have used to find the truth in climate change. As I said before, it is referred to as climate change instead of global warming because it's not a uniform warming if the world, and nor is heating of the world the only observable effect.

Humanity has run this planet into the ground, and it is scum like you that make it so hard to even try to fix it.

Actually, my school does teach critical thinking skills, as the rest should have had the climate change-denying government not cut Gonski funding for I-don't-know-what; I wasn't paying attention to politics half a decade ago. The same government that tried to keep the damage done to the Great Barrier Reef out of a UN report, caused by human activities rendering the waters around Australia unsuitable for coral to live in, calcifying or 'bleaching' them. Yes, the Earth has naturally had large differences in temperature, but the changes occurred over millennia. In the past century the mean temperature of the planet has changed more than in over a thousand years before then, provided I'm remembering my facts correctly. And if I'm not it's barely an exaggeration.

Because that was a more accurate name for how we're fucking up the world? It doesn't cause uniform warming across the world, nor is that its only effect, so it is more accurate to say that humans are changing climates around the world, i.e. causing climate change.

The five is on the wrong side of the watch. That's not a good watch.

Not the game itself; the parts within the PC, such as the CPU or GPU, must be replaced regularly if one wants to have the best gaming computer possible. Or, if you're like me, don't so much as look inside the computer for seven years and then wonder why it won't run Just Cause 3.

They cost slightly less, due to having fixed components rather than steadily upgrading them as better bits are available.

Mere numbers of slaves do not a worse treatment per-slave make. Yes, what happened to the African slaves was terrible, and there were many, but if Smitty is correct an average Irish slave had a much worse life than an average African one.

I read those lines as referencing the creation of the world, with God 'stretching the heavens and spreading the earth' in order to create the world upon which we live. Of course, I've not read these lines in context yet and didn't actually get confirmed into the Lutheran church after a bunch of confirmation classes, so I'm not necessarily the best one to analyse biblical quotes.

I shall have to add that to the list, thanks.