They're gonna rejoice. They don't like him either :/

It's a joke. I was exemplifying "loud mouthed posturing." And you put a lot of effort into that reply.

@Guest_ Eat a dick, queer.

I'M NOT. 'MURICA!

I kinda tied it off.

Food poisoning will.

It's stupid to not want to kill babies?

Yes, but it's alive, and it will turn into a baby.

So it's ok to kill babies?

It's even still a disgrace that women can now kill babies just because it's convenient for them.

Yes but HOW is he abusing his power? Do you know what happened when he met with those foreign officials? And I'm pretty sure that article of the Constitution refers to the US stealing things of value, not making deals or accepting gifts. CNN is just a business. They only operate for ratings and money. He's not banning Muslims. It's not even a ban. He tried to put a HIATUS on travel from TERRORIST HOTBEDS. He wasn't trying to ban ALL Muslims. He's trying to keep the US safe from terrorism, and that's part of his job. Is that so bad? But yeah keep letting in all those "refugees" who've increased your rape statistics to first in the world (1472% increase since you've started letting "refugees" into Sweden) according to the UN and who've also created 55 no go zones where Sharia Law rules your land.

1. While accusing a former president of wiretapping might be outlandish, it does not constitute grounds for impeachment.
2. He's literally just running his business.
3. Trump's "ban", which was actually Obama's list of terrorist hotbeds, does not prohibit Muslims who are already in country to practice their religion. And the other billion Muslims can still get in. He just wanted to put a hiatus on travel from those countries to create a better vetting process while reducing risk from terror attack.
4. Trump wants honest coverage, not favorable coverage. The only news outlet he has not let in is CNN because they slander him.
5. Russia? Really? There's no evidence. Even CNN doesn't believe what CNN is saying. Another reason for why he doesn't want them in his press conferences.
EDIT: Also, the writer was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration and lives in Calfornia. It's obvious that he's butthurt about Hillary losing and looking for every opportunity to bash the president.

There's no grounds. Nancy Pelosi, the queen of Democratic congress said herself there's nothing. But help me interpret. On what grounds is Trump susceptible to impeachment?

So we should just forego the democratic system? Is that what you're suggesting?

Then tell us, oh wise one, who would you have for president?

@guest go back to your field, little sheep.