I get what you are saying, and in a general sense I agree with it. However, this guy is making a request that the girl is not comfortable fulfilling at this stage of the relationship. It is not that she is opposed to copying the picture at all, she just is not there yet.

Oh absolutely, you would come off better than most cotton farmers, but I was thinking in terms of how much work you do for the $$ in comparison to other lines of work.

I have a friend who is a surgeon, and he told me about a woman who had the wrong leg amputated. While it made the news in a big way for a while, but what they didn't say was that the woman had problems in BOTH legs, and the one they cut off was in much worse shape than the other one, it just wasn't causing as much pain. Apparently, she would have lost the second leg anyway in about six months.
The hospital (rightfully) had to pay up, big time, but he went on to explain that, sometimes, it is a bit more complicated than what you read in the news.

As an aside, the adoptive parents are the "real" parents. The biological parents are considered "birth" parents.
But to answer your question, not necessarily. I have never known an adoptive parent who would deny an adult adopted child contact with the birth parents, and if they deny the child contact while they are an older minor, there is typically a good reason. (And if they are a younger minor, say 12 and under, they typically trust their parents to make that decision.)

That is correct, they may not have, though nowadays, views on adoption being different than in previous generations, adoptive kids generally grow up knowing they are adopted. Ours does.