I like this idea 12 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
I doubt this would affect their produce orders as they are going to be losing the same amount of stock either way and would have the same amount of waste. I'd just think that giving away food in large quantities for long enough would mean that people would be less likely to buy goods as they know they can receive it for free, therefore food prices would drop as they are less in demand and supermarkets would have a drop in sales.
▼
Standard measurement 5 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
I like to think the USA just uses the imperial system as one final screw you to the UK
6
So you're tellin me this all started from a bad pass by a quarterback 48 years ago 4 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
Nah, Kim was on her way to fame before anyone knew about her father and the OJ trial. I blame Paris Hilton's need for a wardrobe arranger, thus giving Kim access to a job where she was able to meet influential people.
.
I do like the Kardashians though, entertaining as hell.
3
·
Edited 6 years ago
.
I do like the Kardashians though, entertaining as hell.
I like this idea 12 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
Wouldn't this just make food less valuable and make the supermarket lose money in the long run? I'm all for charity, but they'd have to be incredibly careful doing this wouldn't they?
▼
True masterpiece 35 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
yeah I'm going to agree with @rosalinas here, my goal in life is not for others to think I'm attractive, and to be frank, their opinion doesn't matter. Be your own person and do what makes you happy.
Lemon pepper my justice 18 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
I don't think what I am trying to say is coming off very well. As a parent if one has a drastically different life than the other (i.e Rick Ross vs a standard solo mum) the child will naturally think its great that the father can provide (as gifts) clothing and toys etc. This is not fair on the other parent and is a key reason why child support is a thing. The child's lifestyle should not differ that significantly when living with one parent vs another and the money given is to allow the child (not the mother) to continue living a stable life. This means that if the child needs a new pair of shoes the lesser earning parent is able to afford the same shoes that the higher earning parent would so that the childs viewpoint of the parent is not affected because they can't provide in the way the other can. It's undoubtedly a very flawed system and often is unfairly used by parties on both sides, however in its intended form, all that would be done is for the kid stability.
▼
Lemon pepper my justice 18 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
Rick Ross has enough money to pay for private education and allow a more privileged upbringing, $2800 isn’t going to cover his half of that. Yes she should get a job but he should provide more
▼
True masterpiece 35 comments
Hmmm deep 10 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
No they don't they want a great, special guy who supports and loves them, they walk past average guys who they don't know.
24
Gym review. I'm sold 12 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
He’s gonna get a shock when they up the price and start spitting in his face next month
16
Doctor's notes 2 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
This should’ve been proof for all of my high school teachers who said I shouldn’t use Wikipedia. If doctors can do it Mrs Grant so can I!
2
Devotion 15 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
This is another case of me not reading things properly again... this is becoming a habit
1
I can confirm the last one 15 comments
Devotion 15 comments
mickymouse
· 6 years ago
I was gonna day the same thing, but his message says he wants his stuff back. I’d say Kayla’s the dick for not giving her (ex?) his stuff
▼
I can confirm the last one 15 comments
The future 7 comments