Or you could pretend to be your own twin that's pretending to be you and hint to Jane that you know things like "i know what happened to Courtney"

Easybib?

But I'm gonna go out on a limb and presume you're joking

That didn't quite clear things up

I can't tell if you're joking or being serious

I mean I've never actually been laughed at but I just feel people staring at me the entire time. Exercise is one of those things I just want to be alone doing because I have this constant feeling of being judged

It wasn't intentionally.

yeah no one's going to notice it straight away.

Yeah I definitely agree with giving the mother the option to abort if carrying or giving birth endangers her own life. Although I agree that potential life starts at fertilization, I can see the argument of allowing it in the first trimester. However, a big reason I am against abortion is because people use it for birth control which I don't think is right at all. I don't think it's okay to abort just because they didn't feel like using a condom. There are so many options of birth control, there's no excuse to not use contraception. And I always hear the argument of "what if the condom breaks? what if birth control fails?" Condoms and birth control are some of the most effective forms of contraception if used correctly. It's pretty unlikely for condom to break or for birth control to fail. And I'm not saying people just shouldn't have sex if they don't want to get pregnant, but they need to understand the risk they are taking too. Just be responsible about it.

Your remains can be made into fireworks so you can literally go out with a bang

Also I say "for the most part" because in cases where the mother's life is at risk if she were to continue carrying the baby or give birth to it. In most cases like that, the child isn't likely to live if the mother dies. I think in scenarios like that it is necessary to give the mother the option to abort the child. However if the mother wishes to carry and give birth knowing the risk, then she should be able to do that too.

For the most part yes, I think a fetus in the womb is a life just as valuable as a baby. I don't see why it has to be fully developed and out of the womb to be valued.

The main argument I hear people make is that a fetus is just a group of cells and that it's not alive until out of the womb. But the thing is, cells are the smallest units of life. How can something just made out of cells not be living when cells are considered living organisms? Sure it's not fully developed, but how does that mean it's not living? Just something to ponder on.

No. I believe potential life starts when a zygote is formed from fertilization.