not blaming him but stating that United did everything that was protocol in that situation and is not responsible for the actions of the security force that was hired by the city of Chicago

It was not illegal. The issue is he refused to get off united property and as defined in the text of the department of transportation They have the right to remove him from their property. This is trespassing and he was being placed under arrest. After insisting to stay in his seat otherwise resisting arrest the security which protocol states should be called to remove somebody brutally ripped him out. Even after this though he again resisted arrest and ran back onto the plane.

true im not saying i agree with it but im saying i do not see how united is responsible. They did not train or even hire the agents which took him off the plane in the way that they did. i think the blame should shift to the individual

They technically cannot sue united. BTW not siding with them but i looked into it. Before you buy a ticket you are signing a contract which permits united to kick you off of the plane in a case of an overbook. Now they first go to money and a promise of a free reschedule. They then are allowed to use force to take them off the plane. This is permitted due to the plane technically being private property and you are then considered trespassing. Now I do agree the force used was overkill but he was also resisting arrest which was placed on him when he refused to leave. I in no way shape or form agree with it but the fine text is there he will more than likely lose the legal battle.

I agree

to you they find it more than moral. Your morals do not trump theirs

culture it is their culture and me having been friends with hispanics since i can remember i got involved into it too. It is tradition

Wait what she was low balled for her race so she decided to do something they determined illegal because of how dangerous it is?

ok I can agree that their are a lot of muslims who do not agree with these ideas. The issue here though is that I do not agree that it is not a majority but that is an argument no one can win because no one can truly prove ones true ideas or intentions.

Apparently all you can do is insult. Actually argue if you are going to talk crap you are not worth my time though because you state false knowledge every historical event i said was true and trust me you insulting my political and religious knowledge is pretty hilarious. Now i'm sorry yimmye let me rephrase it for you I was typing fast trying to catch the last of a basketball game. They declared war on us because we kept taking their oil. If that sentence is true why is it they kill people who are not muslim in their country. If you do not follow their faith regardless if you are native to their land they will kill you.

The only issue is that we are the free world and what separates us from the rest of the countries that are free is the fact that we fight to make the world more free and to protect the people who cannot defend themselves. How many people will we simply watch get murdered because it does not directly affect us. The same argument goes for the war with Saddam Hussein I do not believe that we though he had WMD's but he was a maniac who was killing millions of his own people with chemical weapons. Will we simply watch him kill millions of innocence to preserve our own military personal? We are the strongest country out of all the free world and if we do not protect these people no one will. Our ancestors fought hard for freedom so that they could pass it down to the future children and immigrants of the United States. I personally believe that we were blessed with a gift and we should attempt to give it to everybody.

your innocence in cheating astounds me

The oil they declared war on us because we kept taking your oil. Despite the fact that in a lot of their actions they kill just as many other muslims. Are you saying they are rightly justified to act in the way they are acting then. I fail to see how honor killing coral ate with wars on oil.

So what is the reason they live in a crappy environment so they are going to declare war on the entire western world and blow themselves up? They all happen to come from the middle east and they are majority muslim. Yeah that makes sense they are all just from a crappy environment

so you are saying that it just happens to be a coincidence that the majority of people
"twisting" their religion blowing themselves up and and killing people are muslim. Seems to be a little more than a coincidence

how do you know that? Did you interview them because all that i know for a fact that a large number of people keep pledging themselves to the muslim faith before they blow themselves up. Why is it the muslim faith if people are gonna do something they are gonna do something. That does not make sense why would they pledge themselves when they blow up they are gonna be dead. and why are so many people doing it? Does everyone just love the faith so much that they are gonna do it.

You are retarded if you think im associating all muslims with terroism. You are ignorant im simply stating that they are statistically higher in committing these extreme acts in their religion. Ive also debunked you many excuses because you are so ignorant you cannot see it is the religion. When millions of people are getting extreme ideas from the same text it needs reform. Now stop being ignorant maybe actually point out some things instead of insulting and stating things i have not said.

Or until their faith has a reformation I would agree but the flaw is you still see muslims in modern western cultures committing these atrocities most of the honor killings i listed above occured in modern western areas.

im not disagreeing but im finding issues in the fact that a large portion of terror attacks are going towards the muslim faith. That is appearing problematic and the british and french ruled very small portions around the edges.

The middle east was not colonized by europeans though. Also im sorry but im confused are you trying to say because the middle east is so different from the rest of christian society that they are committing extreme acts under their religious name? If so where is the justification because of what the crusades that occured centuries ago they are going massacre Christians. It is not as if they just shook off an oppressing Christian government. Are they gonna blame the western world for ww2 and ww1 cause I do not believe that is any form of colonization or reason to attack the western world.

OH really you are going to downgrade the ruthless drug trade with the cartels or the african war lords who massacre villages and enslave children. I do not think one is better than the other and to say those are not as bad and therefore is an explanation for why they do not kill under Christianity has no correlation. Tell the enslaved children and the people missing limbs that their life is pretty easy compared to the middle east

that is true but my issue is how is it that in areas that could be equally violent south america or africa which have high christian influences are not committing these atrocities in mass for christianity? A lot of the honor killings seen above happened in european or north american countries. Not middle eastern suburbs. That is the troubling factor that I am having with this.