How many books are there in the series so far?

A and B. Funny how a dog that isn't even a pit-bull attacks a person (or dog) and the media callssaid dog a pitbull.
C. Pit-bulls aren't inherently fighting dogs. They were used as fighting dogs because they are tenacious and have strong jaws. However, any dog can be trained to fight and a pitbull who isn't trained to fight (just like any other dog) won't go around fighting.
D. See points A/B and C. Also, pit-bulls are wonderful family dogs and if they are raised right (just like any other dog) then they are great with kids. There is a long list of dead and maimed children from other breeds as well.
F. Oh, I'm sorry but I think you may be confused. I believe that you are the delusion, self-absorbed, self-important, imbecile that forces your arrogant, narrow mind, egotistic, and ignorant opinions on others. You're the type of person that makes me hate humans; making something else suffer because of your selfishness.

The ban basically means that people are no longer allowed to breed any pit bulls and they cannot bring any new pit bull in. However, ones that people already own wouldn't be taken away. But, yes, they are going to ban bringing in even nice ones.

Possible but not natural, as in not occuring in nature. Therefor, they are artificial.

We have a pit-bull and she is honestly one of the sweetest dogs I've ever met. She is really gentle with all the foster kittens and puppies we bring home; they crawl all over her. And our other dog is a pit-bull/lab rescue and she's had several small dogs attack her and never once fought back. It's really all about how you raise them, just as it is with every other breed.

Okay, fair enough! But my problem isn't with technology, it's with the overuse of technology.

Hm, nope, I don't think so!

There have been many studies demonstrating the negative effects that too much technology has had on the growth and development of children's brains. So, while I don't think that technology is purely negative (it has many positive traits), it has certainly caused a lot of problems. And I don't think children 20 years from now will be happy to say that the best memories the have with their parents, siblings, and friends is staring mindlessly at a screen.

I know! I mean, technology is great but it's been proven to be bad for young children (or anyone, really) to be on it for too long. It makes me sad when I walk by an empty playground. Or when I babysit my neighbours kids, who never want to do anything except watch a movie.

That smirk is probably why he keeps getting those parts.

I beg to differ. You don't need to be anorexic to think that about yourself; there's this little thing called low self-esteem. Quite frankly, I'm tired of people throwing around the word anorexic like it isn't a serious illness.

Yeah, but it didn't change him right away. It took a very long time. And I wasn't talking about his heart, I was talking about his personality.

I think that Henry breakibg the pen symbolized that there is no more author. But with OUAT you never really know. What I'm curious about is Emma, because being The Dark One didn't instantly change Rumple, so I imagine that Emma shouldn't be instantly changed either. Or am I forgetting something from the earlier seasons? I'm wondering if they're going to do a time jump.

I feel like Henry is going to become more important in Season 5. I really want a story for Hook beyond Emma, and I would love to see more of Belle!

Glad I'm not the only one! I mean, so what? You're telling me that guys can wear their pants down to their knees but god forbid my bra strap shows? Screw that!