5/10

They were sued by the California Attorney General. Forced to pay $300,000

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Pilot_Flying_J_Battle_at_Bristol

Sorry, I got the name wrong, but the Chicago Department of Aviation Officers are police officers, not just "some guy from security."

What's sad is that many want to legislate hate speech, yet can offer no better of a definition than you. According to a University of Florida professor protesting a Ben Shapiro appearance on campus, hate speech is "when you attack specific groups or people, like you make fun or have derogatory comments about transgender people or women." When asked if as part of free speech, hate speech should be protected, her response was "no, it shouldn't be protected. It becomes dangerous." Given that every single person can be associated with a group, pretty much any negative comment said about anyone ever, could be defined as hate speech. The fact that people don't recognize this Orwellian notion is what's really really sad.

Because that's not how free speech works. Please define for me speech that hurts others?

Why would you put free speech in quotes? Speech that you don't agree with, even disgusting, reprehensible speech is protected, as it should be.

Right? And then they put it on a tshirt.

Actually, it Gilchrist, Texas. The house was the newest built in the neighborhood, therefore built to newer codes and standards.

Only on the internet would people look at a tradition that forces women to wear an article of clothing so as to not "tempt" other men and turn it into empowerment.