Well damn, I can't help it, one more comment, "I personally think his definition of a radical is spot on. Anyone who thinks killing of any kind, save for in self defence, is monstrous. Let me tell you, killing civilians is not self-defence."
Donald Trump says (and he was not the only one of the US presidential candidates to do so) that US should carpet bomb Irak and Syria (which would kill many many civilians). Since he has the support of approximately half of US, I derive that he and his supporters are all radicals. Would you aggree? If not I might start to suspect you are being hypocrytical...

And one last comment, I also love how he makes a "clear distinction" between radicals and terrorists, but then goes about to hint, well just exactly that. You know it is exactly like when people say, I am not racist but...<Insert the most racist and bigotted thing you can imagine here>. It simply does not make it any different to the listener to be honest.

Just one question, any sources for your claims of women and children not being able to partake in these surveys (and according to you, any aspect of life apparently) other than biased personal opinion? Or more so, do you know any Muslims personally? I love how people can paint a whole group of people a single color by their own opinion, while even Siamese twins can have totally different personalities. And I love the fact that it is ok to be radical of <insert some group you are ok with> and not ok to be a radical of <the group we don't like>. Does he even bother to explain what "strict Sharia rule" means? And how many thousands of interpretation it can get. Stop believing everything you hear, and start reading objective sources.

Yes UN won't let him bomb Isis. While he has no problem bombing us backed opposition and thus civilians, and no problem invading Ukraine and annexing Crimea. Of course UN is totally ok with those. Does anyone really believe that?