Not true, the Germans were already starting to lose the war and overextending themselves before America joined. Sure, you helped, but you weren't the defining factor in winning the war. Stop with your "you're welcome" bullshit.

Me neither

Aye, gotta take advantage of it before I move out

Well I still live at home, so it's saving money

Not the word itself, but a bulge does have a d in it

Grim is Giantdad confimed

I'm in production, so it's not a fancy schmancy job either

I work at a place that produces firefighting foam

Kinda same

Ben Shapiro uses half truths and manipulated facts to push his agenda, but Peterson is an actual psychocologist with some really valid points. Don't hate just because he isn't left leaning.

I'm fine, and you?

I updated the comment. Seems like my phone doesn't wanna copy from the google app.
.
Almost all news articles are biased. However, knowing my country and the EU I highly doubt the US is the only ones cutting down on emissions.

With your logic we should stop treating cancer altogether because we literally fill people with toxins and radiation and everyone don't survive. IT'S MURDER, THAT LIFESAVING THING THEY'RE DOING. Or heart surgery, or brain surgery, or surgery on shooting victims, or car accidents or any ithet medocal procedure that has a risk of harming but if you don't do anything they're probably gonna die anyway. You're sitting on a very high horse given that a large reason you're even alive, or that your father is alive or even grandfather is because of vaccines and that they didn't die at the age of 1 because of some preventable disease.

Vaccines save more lives than they take. They also save mor elives than people who get sick by the vaccines. The benefits far outweigh the few cons. Not vaccinating is an even bigger Russian roulette where there's four bullets in the magazine rather than one with vaccination. And that one bullet might not even have negative outcomes in the long run. Because usually when you get sick from a vaccine it's a weaker version of the sickness that isn't gonna kill you AND you become immune for either a long time or the rest of your life. The few cases that have an allergic reaction or similar is an even mkre rrason to vaccinate, because that means they can't become immune so a vaccinated society has to act like a barrier for those people. Not vaccinating "just because it be bad hurr durr" will kill or harm the people who can't vaccinate because of the allergic reactions.

I've been waiting to use this
https://youtu.be/OWXoRSIxyIU
Check the description for individual sources (so don't just say "it's just a youtube video").

Since i don't know which specific article guest is talking about I don't knkw which date it's from, but with a little google search I found another article on the same matter from NY Times
(Here’s How Far the
World Is From Meeting
Its Climate Goals by Brad Plumer, New York Times, 6th November 2017)
Where it states that the US is not the only country who has reduced emissions. It quite clearly shows that the EU was already going down. Since my source states otherwise either guest is twisting what he read or either article is twisting the facts. Either way I'm sceptical until guest can give some more sources on that ONLY the US has reduced emissions.

What guest did is not citing a source. He cited the paper that published the source. A proper source has the name of the article, date and author, or just a simple link.

Source please

Are you accusing me of being dishonorable to my word? The nerve of you, Madame.The very nerve.

*gets attracted* now what?

"Looks like shit for conquering" roughly.

Of course