TheKaylaPup

thekaylapup


— TheKaylaPup Report User
You can't cuck the tuck 9 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
In many places condoms and birth control are both tax exempt.
But diapers are not dispite the fact that having too few diapers (because they are expensive) leads to babies not getting changed often enough, which leads to diaper rash and increased likelyhood of infections. Therefore adequate diapers actually do prevent disease.
So, all in all, it's not simple. And the woman with the above sign is adding confusion to an already complicated issue.
3 · Edited 5 years ago
You can't cuck the tuck 9 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
So, I have a problem with this on a couple levels.
Firstly: The actual issue with tampons is that they are taxed. And many people feel they shouldn't be taxed because they are a necessity. Suggestingbtgey should be free is a completely different arguement that makes the orginal arguement seem less vaild.
Secondly: Most places tax razors. They are considered a luxury item and are taxed as such.
To further complicate the issue, diapers are also taxed as a luxury item in most places (same as tampons and razors).
And if you think that clears the issue up (obviously we tax hygiene as a luxury) in some states adult diapers ARE tax exempt. And in most states dandruff shampoo is tax exempt. (However it is notable that dandruff shampoo is tax exempt on the grounds that it is medicine)
I want to point out that medicines are tax exempt if they "diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent disease or illness" and so are some medical products like sunscreen, lip balm and eye drops.
5
And then everybody clapped! 76 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
I wouldn't stay on a date with someone who was opposed to that ad. And when I read this post to my roommate her response was "atta girl". I think its completely feasible that this happened.
8
Onion onion knight 8 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Wow. Impressive
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
They wouldn't be restricted from moving on with the subjects they excelled in.
Unfortunately for this to work lessons would need to be given out nearly exclusively by video, and teachers jobs would have to include managing students progress in a very different way. Also you would probably need to give students some level of responsibility over their education. And we tend to stray away from that for some reason.
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Also, I agree that it's a bad decision to just move kids on to the next level when they aren't ready for it, I think that the idea of just failing students as a solution is fundamentally broken. In fact, making students repeat an entire subject when they struggled with a couple units or worse a whole year when they did really well in some subjects is hurting their education far more than its helping.
There isn't an easy way to fix this the way things are set up now. Ideally, student would have lessons they were expected to complete and they could do them as long as they had done prerequisites. Grade levels would become obsolete as a child could be 10, still working on getting down subtracting fractions with common denominators, but also learning to write a 3 paragraph essay. Or a kid could be 16, still struggling to write a 3 paragraph essay, but also doing calculus. Obviously it would be important to ensure students kept working on subjects even if they weren't good at them, but
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
@lucky11 I'm not doubting it's a problem, it's just definitely not the only problem. I spent enough observation hours in schools to tell you that there are definitely students struggling that teacher just literally do not have time to help. I can't even be 100% certain that isn't what was being observed. Often time with something like Grandparents day there are extra activities and interruptions to the norm that mean you absolutely need to get every lesson done quickly. Sometimes it is more time efficient to just let students be right on a day like that as long at what they said was remotely passable. It's also possible that they were actually doing fairly well for the level they were expected to read at. If you don't encourage students for doing well relative to what they have shown they can do they will often feel discouraged. Some kids refuse to try entirely. Again, I could be wrong, not all teacher are good teachers and this could be an example of a bad teacher.
I googled the differences between llamas and alpacas... found this. 11 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
It seems as though you have lived an interesting life @silvermyth
4
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Computers can even grade them on some assignments. And teachers would have more time to help individual students who need it. Or read every essay thoroughly instead of skimming over them as quickly as they can at 11pm because they just want to go to bed.
Obviously I don't want computers to replace teachers. Humans can help a struggling student in a way that computers can't. But I think that using computers to replace the more repetitive and time consuming parts of a teachers day would allow us a better education for everyone.
1
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Even if a teacher spends that time helping students, it's not nessicary enough time, and then he or she must evaluate student work on their own time. Which leads to the kind of overworked teachers who want to help genuinely but are to stressed and tired to notice that little Timmy's poor grades directly correlated to when he started wearing that same sweater all the time even though its 80 degrees and he's clearly hiding evidence of child abuse.
More teachers would help, obviously, but so could some changes in how we teach. Many schools across America are opting to give students laptops instead of more teachers. I assume this is a combination of getting good deals and the fact that it looks better to the public. Giving kids laptops makes you look like a good school. Hiring more teachers only makes you look like a bigger school. But I digress.
We can make videos of the same lesson, and then assign students to watch them and ask questions when they need assistance.
1
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
@lucky11 I agree that reading and vocabulary should be taught better than it is, bit I severely disagree with the stated cause. Some teachers might do this, but it's been my experience that when a student doesn't get the extra help they need with reading/vocabulary, it's because the teacher is struggling to balance teaching 30 kids everything the core says he or she must teach, while enforcing a basic code of conduct to maintain order. And yeah, that's 100% a teacher's job, but that job doesn't actually allow enough time to give every student the attention they need.
I think the real problem is that our schools are understaffed and the current curriculum requirements need revisions. Also, the way we teach could use some refining.
Teachers spend most of their days teaching lessons to rooms of students. And often spend student work time evaluating student work. Which leaves little to no time for helping students.
1
So, Monty Python was right 24 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Also avoid too much sugar.
2
The kid with super power! 8 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Well, Aang was the Avatar, so he actually could do both.
But yeah, if Thor were in that world he would be considered a firebender
2
The kid with super power! 8 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
I think they are referring to lifting the hammer.
1
For meal your 22 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
I speak English natively and I still didn't get it. Thank you for the explanation.
7 · Edited 5 years ago
Remember the uncomfortable Anna meme? Anyone? 5 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
But it's only funny because if the reposts. They give you the context
1
Remember the uncomfortable Anna meme? Anyone? 5 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Yeah, but I think that an inside joke gaining popularity is the whole premise of modern memes.
In the beginning, memes were something most people could understand. But now a lot memes don't make any sense unless you have enough shared experience to understand them. Even here people were confused about posts about the building if they missed the begging until they gained enough experience to understand.
And I think that's a good sign. You can have shared meaningful experiences through memes. Before the internet inside jokes were typically limited to a few close friends. But now we can have that with strangers.
And it will make a mark. A week from now the building meme will have died, however a year from now when someone finds the meme on random with 12 watermarks, they will repost it and everyone who was here will remember.
The original version isn't even funny. It only works because it's a trend. The highway exit meme that @silvermyth posted is so much funnier than the reposts.
2
So, Monty Python was right 24 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
I did. I sort by all. :)
It's really nice to be known and remembered though.
2
So, Monty Python was right 24 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Yes?
Paying Attention to a Penny 4 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
@vitklim- I reposted the building. This was supposed to be a joke.
· Edited 5 years ago
Building wants what it wants 5 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
This is my favorite so far
4
What a chunky water chicken 21 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
If someone was willing to give me millions of dollars to slap a duck, I absolutely would do so.
I don't condone animal abuse, and generally I think it's wrong to slap a duck. However, if someone has the kind of money to pay people exorbitantly for minor animal abuse, I definitely feel that it would be remiss not to take some of that wealth off their hands. Not only is that enough money to be comfortable my entire life, it's enough to do that for myself and help many people who need it.
So even though I think its wrong to slap a duck, I still feel morally justified in doing so for millions of dollars
15 · Edited 5 years ago
This is ****ed up 15 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Honestly, anyone doing this should be prosecuted for some kind of endangerment anyway.
Even if you don't think dogs should have rights (and I disagree, as do many anti animal abuse laws) this is still a serious matter. Those tennis balls were left at parks, right? What happens if a child picks it up and try to eat it? Even if you left these exclusively at dog parks, I know parents of toddlers who will let there kid run around with their dog so long as there aren't dogs they don't know/trust at the park at that moment.
Leaving poison in a public place where children and pets can reach it should be treated seriously.
And people who do this and are caught should at the bare minimum be required to undergo a psyche evaluation and required to go to some kind of counselor or support group. If for no other reason than to ensure they aren't also likely to poison Halloween candy, and also maybe because being willing to poison pets in a park is a sign that something is wrong.
7
This guy lives in 3019 8 comments
thekaylapup · 5 years ago
Yes. Although doing this is actually less battery efficient. The 1 battery will die faster from the extra strain and you'll end up using more batteries than if you just use them 2 at a time.
5