Alright, if this guest is going to seriously bitch about so called POC whining about having to live in the country where they are not the primary ethnicity, I can suggest the solution of an ethnostate. Kick them the fuck out, and they won't have the problem.

By doing what exactly, chanting "death to cops"? Because that's what their fucking protests looked like. Not to mention that they were protesting because a criminal got rightfully shot for assaulting the police with a weapon, or that they were demanding free money and control over the prison system, or that they simply called everyone racist instead of maybe trying to figure out why there are so many criminals in their community.
Given that their riots were essentially marches of people chanting "What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now.", and they were beating people up just for being white, they are fucking black supremacists and are on the same level as Antifa.

Yes, which is why I have no other criticism to even lob its way.

Heh, the only one of those I even watch is Marvel. So yeah, i'm nowhere near the target audience.

If you are willing to overlook inaccuracies to the real world events, sure.

Doesn't matter what they own, they already ruined Star Wars, and are now ruining their originals, by doing shitty remakes. They will go down on their own.

Damn, I just started to read into it for the first time, and it seems like an amazing well of stupid fun. Same here, bud.

Not only the comment, but the account too.

I prefer kvas. It's not as sweet as any other flavored drink, but it;s certainly healthier.

I'll actually add another point on top of this, where does most of the medical research and innovation happen? And what country produces the pharmaceuticals that are then bought and distributed to other countries? Think the answer is pretty clear.

That at least already means that the list is misleading, and if it works better in other countries, there may be other reasons for that to be the case. But of course, why bother with details when you can create a cheap dunk.

The hell you mean no matter who is in office? Have you seen anywhere as much negative press when Obama was in office?
MSM lost their shit when Trump started running, with 92% of coverage on him being negative, who the hell else would they dumpster as hard.

Yeah, well I can confirm for a fact that at least in Russia universal healthcare is utter garbage. I lived there, I would fucking know. Maybe not the case in the other countries, but already incorrect.

My main point here, is that as you've probably already understood, when we are talking about rights, we are talking not about women's rights, but human rights.
If your guiding principle is of freedom, then the fight for rights is universal, without regard for gender. Feminism has been corrupted for 30 years, and it keeps getting worse. I would rather abandon the movement and the term.
.
Women have their rights in the first world. The minute details are and deserve to be debated, but they have the right to work, to vote and to be treated the same under the law. So our need for feminism is over.
.
The rest of the world, needs not feminism, but liberalism, as one will eventually lead to the accomplishments of the other.
.
We seem to agree on everything but the path forward. I would rather abandon the husk of feminism, and stick to the basic principle behind the systems that made the first world great in the first place.

Our main difference here is just how much we understand of the philosophy behind the movements. Women's freedom is a natural outgrowth of men's freedom, of universal freedom. This in fact, is why in the UK for instance, the country that invented, if not perfected liberalism, women got the right to vote only 9 years after men did.
.
As the original commentor pointed out, feminism's guiding principle is stated to be equality. Which is why at this point it has denegrated into gender communism, the desire for absolute equality in everything. Because once freedom has been achieved, it was not "equal" enough.
.
My point with the Trinity is the example of how the key principles behind the philosophies manifest. Fascism and communism, were both based on principles other than freedom, and as such, caused immeasurable suffering to individual people, for the "greater good". And if feminism's guiding principle right now is that of equality, it will go down the same road.

The trinity of the Enlightenment philosophies are Freedom, Security and Equality. Freedom is liberalism, Security is fascism, and Equality is communism. Today, there is only one left standing, and that is Freedom.
.
So I don't need feminism to argue for the rights that should be universal. Liberalism is enough.
.
Oh yes, almost forgot, @xvarnah

You will have to excuse me for such a delay, but for some reason I couldn't post the comment before.
.
But as I said, the evolution in the theory of feminism never stopped, and because of that, it found new problems to overcome, no matter how minute or inconsequential. It did so in order to persist as an ideology.
.
But they didn't lie, their principle is in fact equality. Which is why they are marxists, and will not stop at anything to achieve it. Equality is not one of my principles, my principle is of freedom.
You can argue that women should have the right to vote because they are part of the same social contract with the government, you can argue that they should be able to work because it gives them the right of self-determination, the same as men do. And you never have to appeal to any equality aside from equality in the face of the law, which is the root of freedom.
.
Do you understand now, why I despise feminism, just as much as I despise communism and fascism?

Women are not a class in any measurable way. They don't have the same experiences, opinions, or goals in life.
And just to be clear, I am talking about feminist theory here. If you want to know more, I suggest the book "Women vs Feminism" by Joanna Williams.
.
The reason why feminism became a movement in the first place was because of the fault in the system of democracies at the time. They were not universal in the ability to vote, and that was the problem. You can make an argument for women being able to vote and work without being a feminist, because you will be guided by different principles in doing so, in my opinion, superior principles.