The banks have gotta be able to work with whoever happens to have the ball at any given moment

? Explain?

I'm saying that both people and morality are complicated, and neither are one dimensional. A paedophile who gets help and never touches a kid might be a better person than me - inasmuch as it's even possible for one person to be 'better' than another.

Yeah! Nuance is for the weak

So then, what is freedom?

I don't imagine rapists are all that concerned by the validity of their actions, generally. No, anarchy would be shit. Schools and hospitals are awesome, and your autonomy is every bit as illusory as my safety. No man is an island.

But those rules already *are* at the cost of your autonomy, it's just that you choose to exercise that autonomy by defending you and yours, and not by, say, raping children.

Define "freedom" though. It's a powerful word that we toss around a lot, but I don't think many people really give much thought to what it actually is, beyond 'being able to do what I want without someone trying to stop me.' Which is problematic if what you want to do is, say, rape children.

TIL that there's a whole corner of the internet dedicated to discussion of the presidential penis o.O

I could be deader