That's a pointless thing to make seeing with the fact that the person with that bullet proof car you speak of has his own country. That's like trying to make a point because the dude that founded sealand did something.

I expect the future to have cyborg winged hussars saving Europe for a second time, if it doesn't happen I will be disappointed

No I would most definitely prefer 0 baby interruptions than 1 short baby interruption.

I think they are talking about a boat going by and waving at the people on the land

Churches are non profits. That's a basic fact. Non church non profits are hella more likely to be currupt. Every major non profit that everyone knows about pays their ceo enough that they could quit after a year and never work a day in their life again. Churches barely get by and even then they still sacrifice necessary things to be charitable.
Idk how backwards it is where you live but in America you can't preemptive punish for something someone might do. You also cant treat a portion of a group (NPOs) differently because a minority of the minority are bad people. By the logic we should tax churches because a tiny amount of them are currupt, we should arrest everyone on funsub because a portion of them are criminals.

Why am I being downvoted for an undeniable fact?

But what about that thing that humans do where they somehow gain superpowers when they try to help people they care about, that's also cool.
Oooo ooo or when dogs get stuck in something and act like totally nothing is wrong for sure and look adorable

Oh this phone is on it's last legs, it has scorch marks on the back from overheating and cracks in the front glass, the back camera doesn't work and the glass around it is shattered.

There isn't going to be a citation of them not allowing someone else to come in and fuel his plane because that's the default.
-
Also get your story straight. Either planes have enough fuel left to take off and fly around again when they land or they carry the bare minimum to land and be refueled before take off again. You can't have both.
-
A personal jet is far too large to be hauled on a civilian road.
The airport owns the place it is stored. The people that work at the airport refuse to service to plane. By default an airport will not allow random "strike breaker" contractors to come onto their airport and work unless they themselves hired them. You are not going to get a private jet down a civilian road. The wingspan of a plane that can do intercontinental travel is going to clip into the other lanes by a LOT.
-

i will reiterate: if they do not fuel the plane, the plane cannot leave the airport. Other people cannot legally come in and fuel the plane. The plane cannot legally be taken out of the airport via any route other than it being fueled and it flying away. If a mechanic refused to fuel your car, does not allow other people to come into his property to fuel your car, has your car in a place where towing is not legally an option, he is keeping your car on his property and allowing you no way of retrieving it and is breaking the law. this is the exact same situation. They will not fuel the plane. Other people are not allowed to come in and fuel the plane. The plane is in a place where towing is not legally an option, they are keeping his plane on airport property without allowing him a way to retrieve it ergo breaking the law

he would have to take it to a different airport to get it fueled. To get it to a different airport it has to be fueled. You cant just haul a plane down the highway. It would be LITERALLY impossible to fuel the plane without the union folks working at specifically the airport his plane is it. You cant just bring in other random people to work in a place that they dont work. You cant tow a plane. I think you might need to re-understand how planes work.

what the US military uses doesnt matter. This isnt the US military that is being discussed, its civilian europe and the most common rounds and weapons are of the hunting variety. idk about europe but around here we very often use 308 rounds for hunting deer as well as muzzle loaders which, as you said above with muskets, we pre-messure to be effectively a 50 cal round but with modern projectiles rather than round shot.

,even if he can phsycially touch his plane, if he is functionally unable to retrieve it from your property because of your refusal to finish a service you are breaking the law. Period, full stop, no technicalities no if ands or buts you are breaking the law.

if they refuse him access to his plane they are stealing the plane from a legal point of view. seeing with the fact that his plane cant be on his own property as he owns no property in Australia at the time then they have legally stolen a plane.
take it from famousones example.
this is the legal equivalent (as in its literally the same legal issue) of a mechanic accepting your business and starting work on your car with the agreement that the now empty tank will be filled before the work is done followed by the mechanic refusing to finish the job and then further refusing to allow you to take your vehicle out of his property (as it is physically impossible to move the vehicle out of the mechanics property without the fuel that he had already stated he was going to put it in)
it doesnt matter what technicality you want to try to bring up of "oh he can get to his plane all he wants." the law gives 0 shits about your technicalities. If he is functionally unable to retrieve his plane

my 5s is my current phone

My 5s dies if I don't plug it in to use it as an alarm clock

Nono what you want to do is farm them where they are cheap and export them to where they are expensive

Plate armor against modern guns isn't going to do anything.

You literally restated what I said in a less concise way