You could make the argument that it's not rape if a child agrees to sex? (Obviously psychological consent, not legal consent as they're not able to do this)
There is no shortage of 13 year olds that consented with someone of their own age, why can't they consent with someone older? The discussion also goes both ways, if they discuss sex with parents and doctors what's the issue?
(In case it needs saying, these are not necessarily my views, I'm engaging in thought experiments and discussion here)

The argument is often something like "But that is who they really are; they're a boy in girl's body or vice versa, or some non-binary identity"
.
I suppose you could say that if they're mature enough to make that call to the point of physical alterations, then they're old enough to consent to sex
.
I don't like where this could lead

Not much
They're not psychoactive

Yessir

What else would we do?

I'll DM both of you. Threesome?

Sure, the language used is arbitrary. The concept isn't

There's more:
Postmodernists see rules as arbitrary - all rules are ultimately arbitrary
.
Thus "2+2=4" is, in their minds, not a universal self evident truth
It's an expression of "power" by the "dominant group" (white people, apparently)
If another "group" came to "power" then that group could decide that "2+2=5"

Do you like dinosaurs?

Not yet
But resisting authoritarianism is a hill that might be worth dying on

Yeah I've already doxxed them

*squints*

>.>

Yeah it's for "destroying" tanks, like your mother

Cum to think of it, his name was....it was me
Damn