captainjackharknes
Here's a little something for you all to know.I post in character.If you're a bit upset because I flirted with you,I'm just in character.And no space left to ty
— CaptainJackHarknes Report User
Dun dun dun hurrrrrr 9 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Meanwhile, me, a, well I wouldn't say happy, more like well enough, but the point is I have neither apple or Android. I use a Kindle Fire, with the play store side loaded on it so I can get my usual apps.
He's not wrong but but 31 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Using the same bathroom in the same room as anyone else is just gross, regardless of gender.
1
He's not wrong but but 31 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
No, there are three. One upstairs, one downstairs, and one in the garage.
1
He's not wrong but but 31 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Except... I personally know everyone in my house, and without a doubt none of them will use the bathroom at the same time as me.
4
When furries become the voice of reason 13 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Your only argument is 'YouTube MUST make sure people can keep using it to make money.'
No it doesn't. YouTube is a company owned thing, the roads are owned by the government. The government may have to prevent the loss of jobs, and help keep the economy stable, but YouTube doesn't. It isn't about 'Well they should'. It's about 'They literally can do what they want about the subject.' They never had to start paying people. They did so because they thought it might increase their overall profit. And if it isn't bringing in as much money as it used to, they can stop if they want.
None of this is about right or wrong, is about whether they can or can't. You keep on saying how the government can't close roads, so YouTube can't stop paying people, but the two things are held to totally different rules and laws. Yes they may be both platforms, but the literal laws in place that control what can and cannot be done with them by their respective owners are so different, it negates it entirely.
▼
No it doesn't. YouTube is a company owned thing, the roads are owned by the government. The government may have to prevent the loss of jobs, and help keep the economy stable, but YouTube doesn't. It isn't about 'Well they should'. It's about 'They literally can do what they want about the subject.' They never had to start paying people. They did so because they thought it might increase their overall profit. And if it isn't bringing in as much money as it used to, they can stop if they want.
None of this is about right or wrong, is about whether they can or can't. You keep on saying how the government can't close roads, so YouTube can't stop paying people, but the two things are held to totally different rules and laws. Yes they may be both platforms, but the literal laws in place that control what can and cannot be done with them by their respective owners are so different, it negates it entirely.
When furries become the voice of reason 13 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
YouTube is not the government. It is it's own company, and without any sort of legal contracts, they can do what they want with their platform. You are providing a 'what if scenario' to a whole different thing. Yes, if the government did take full control over roads and prevented people from using them it would cause massive job loss. But guess what? We're talking about a corporate entity. One that does pay people using ad revenue earned from the popularity gained by that user, but unless they are directly hired by YouTube, and made employees, they could stop that system whenever they wanted. Would it be bad for their business? Yes. But could they be persecuted by law? No. My point is that, there is no job security in being a YouTuber, and people should realize that. People act surprised when it stops working out for them, and they need a job with laws in place that prevents unlawful termination.
▼
NSFW because possibly SU spoilers and also Homestuck 6 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
tHEY WATCH CAMP PINING HEARTS WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY A ROM COM NOT ANIME
1
When furries become the voice of reason 13 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Except YouTube owns the platform. Yes, you can make a living from it, but honestly, I wouldn't consider it a job, because there's nothing really stopping YouTube from 'firing' you. You are not hired by them, and they are not employers, so there are no laws to help keep your 'position' secure.
▼
Do it 2 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Man, I don't even downvote memes unless I hate them. Guess I kinda dislike this, so better mAKE SURE TO DOWNVOTE IT
pretty accurate to me 26 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Nope, haven't have out my friend code-oh wait i forgot theres the 'played with' friend thing. Been playing Paladins which is multiplayer. Also, Just got BoTW
1
Hershey's Chocolate-Like Substance 27 comments
Chief apathetic Gull 6 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
i oWN 8 PAIRS OF CARGO SHORTS, MATTER OF FACTLY, THEY ARE THE ONLY TYPE OF SHORTS I WEAR
2
Legend 2 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Before this argument starts;
Yes, generally it is frowned apon to do that, because planes usually don't shoot down defenseless parachuters. But the plane he shot down was shooting down people who had ejected, so he played dead for a bit, and managed to shoot down that plane.
4
Yes, generally it is frowned apon to do that, because planes usually don't shoot down defenseless parachuters. But the plane he shot down was shooting down people who had ejected, so he played dead for a bit, and managed to shoot down that plane.
If you’re having a bad day, look at this hedgehog on a camping trip 5 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Now I'm having a worse day cause I'm not camping with that hedgehog.
4
pretty accurate to me 26 comments
pretty accurate to me 26 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
I got two friends out of this, so who's the mysterious other friend?
pretty accurate to me 26 comments
pretty accurate to me 26 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
Not like I have any multiplayer games other than Stardew Valley tho
pretty accurate to me 26 comments
captainjackharknes
· 5 years ago
I'm gonna start with my current list. Also, someone else should manage my funds because I spent money I technically don't have just to get Stardew Valley, because I eas getting tired of the same 2 free games.
1
