Comments

It's sped up

Science in the 1900s is nothing like science in the 21st century dumbass. There are thousands of research papers on the existence of climate change with actual evidence unlike heroin being "a good medicine". Scientific consensus today is achieved by intense pondering of critical research. Cut the ridiculous equivalence of modern science with the shit that passed for science in the past. You say not to use insults after calling someone retarded. Stating that scientific consensus exists is not the same as peer pressure; it's intended to demonstrate that authorities in the field agree on the science, aiding its credibility.

If you choose to reject overwhelming scientific consensus you aren't going to last long in today's world. Also, understanding climate science doesn't make you a snowflake. I am quite the conservative and it's common sense that human activity alters the climate of the planet. The only ambiguity in the theory exists in the severity of the consequences of climate change.

Same