Comments

'murica 14 comments
guest · 5 years ago
And to what level has the planet emerging from its last ice age been sped up by the industrial revolution? If you can make that claim then surely there’s been a comparison model presented that I haven’t seen; I’m always looking to bring my knowledge and opinion closer to the truth. At what rate has human activity “sped up” the earths heating and cooling cycles? Where should we be vs where it is? Sea levels are supposed to rise, I currently live in a landlocked area, the closest ocean is 1800 kms from here and yet this used to be an ancient ocean. Ice caps are supposed to melt, Antarctica has had tropical temperatures at least twice in the past.
Unless you can cite to what degree human activity has accelerated a natural process and where you got this opinion from, I think the responsible thing to do would be to redact yourself and only put forth correct ideas that are provable.
'murica 14 comments
guest · 5 years ago
The Chinese are building a new coal plant every week. The concept of ‘manmade climate change’ should be proved scientifically, as in be skeptical, ask questions, perform experiments correlate the data. There are two types of people right now, skeptics asking for proof and fans of Fraud Nye the Science Actor; how can we ever have discussion let alone a consensus when asking for proof of these grandiose claims (man is making the sky fall and only taxes can stop it) is met with shouts of “Denier!” from the true believers?
Of course everyone is concerned about the environment we live in, that’s the beauty of wrapping totalitarian restrictions in the guise of topics no one in their right mind would be against. But just saying something don’t make it so; where are these claims coming from? are the sources cited? Is the experiment repeatable?
Meteorologists are unable to accurately predict the weather within 3 degrees for the next 5 Saturdays.
Moon > 5 comments
guest · 5 years ago
Did someone wait 28 or 365 days for that shot?