Comments
Insurance companies hate this one simple tip 30 comments
guest
· 4 years ago
If I missed anything (both in favor of or against my logic) please feel free to point it out.
Insurance companies hate this one simple tip 30 comments
guest
· 4 years ago
If we follow that line of thought we could easily see the "keys of life" being handed over to the government. As they would more than likely be the ones to dictate who should be allowed to bear children. That to me would be a fairly scary thought.
Insurance companies hate this one simple tip 30 comments
guest
· 4 years ago
This seems to be more of another potatoes to carrots comparison than a potatoes to potatoes.
While yes there is a similarity of sorts between that of a terminally ill person and that of an unborn child; it becomes less so when talking about outcome. The outcome for that of a terminally ill person is generally a slim to none chance of life. Though in the case of an unborn child generally they have a decent shot at living. Though we can argue against that stating that an unborn child is just that unborn and it's quality of life is in imaginary variable that can't be stated. If we argue that then we must ask "well what constitutes a high enough quality of life in order for that child to 'be worthy' of living"? At that point we could easily see having children being reserved for the elite of society. This, yes, would probably solve the issue of overpopulation but would easily and inevitably lead to a distinct lack thereof...
▼
While yes there is a similarity of sorts between that of a terminally ill person and that of an unborn child; it becomes less so when talking about outcome. The outcome for that of a terminally ill person is generally a slim to none chance of life. Though in the case of an unborn child generally they have a decent shot at living. Though we can argue against that stating that an unborn child is just that unborn and it's quality of life is in imaginary variable that can't be stated. If we argue that then we must ask "well what constitutes a high enough quality of life in order for that child to 'be worthy' of living"? At that point we could easily see having children being reserved for the elite of society. This, yes, would probably solve the issue of overpopulation but would easily and inevitably lead to a distinct lack thereof...
