Comments

That might be slightly funny, in an ironical way, if "climate change" meant anything at all. [ a heads-up: on this planet, the climate has been "changing" for approximately 4.5 BILLION years, or thereabouts. ]

... or even "animes" - that is, if the author had even the slightest about spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Must be American, I guess ...

We see the juxtaposition, the patterns, which we've learned to interpret.

.. all of them, the whole 99%, sad really, being wrong.
Try the Sun ...

... and .. your problem is .. ?

That's a coal mine in Japan. People lived there, worked there, went to school there ...

And .. as an Aussie, I know where that is ... look for the dinosaur footprints in the rocks.

Sounds exactly like any normal spin from the lefty-democrap-labor-socialism-commo blob (pick any one or more, or all).

So ... what? the "political science" majors know where the "missing 95%" is ... ?

How would the report KNOW the number is halved, when it's impossible to know how many fish are there at first?

It ain't "reflected" moron, it's just a shadow.

All this crap MIGHT have some degree of validity .. IF there was one, just one, properly peer-reviewed, properly duplicated, properly confirmed, properly investigated, study that DEFINITIVELY and CAUSALLY links increased CO2 to planetary temperatures.
There isn't. Hypothesis therefore falsified. "Catastrophic anthropogenic global warming" therefore revealed as the complete and utter bullSHIT marxist waffle that is is.
Drop the mike.

No wonder she had to use a gun ...

1. 'Spose they would be if they COULD form a rational scientific thought pattern.
2. "Spose it would matter IF "human-caused global warming" was actually real

Wait .. What??? You have to PAY for a bloody ambulance in the US??? You're JOKING, surely?? What kind of a third-world country do you guys have there, anyway??

or perhaps "needs", if one knew how to spell.