Comments

If you recognize that abortion ends a life, it's hard to make the argument that it's only a woman's choice. For example, you wouldn't say that I shouldn't have an opinion on a man beating his girlfriend or wife because I've never beat a woman. Or that you or I can't have a valid opinion on murder because we've never committed murder (making an assumption about you, of course).

Saying that a man has no legal consequences for an unwanted child is both wrong and facetious. Factious because men are saddled with responsibility, and wrong because "I can't make someone else pay for someone so we may as well kill that someone" is a pretty bad philosophy.

If they could get the actor, I bet they could write a clever way of bringing him back (cloning?).

Plus,mothers could be flashbacks.

So....if the government infringes on our second amendment rights, I'm a hero for keeping my just-became-illegal firearms?

That's a twist...there was they examined what was the contents of a sperm whale instead on the sperm that was the contents of a girl from Wales.

Removing warning labels will result in massive homicide? The post doesn't advocate making murder legal...it just suggests removing warning labels.

Its...no apostrophe.

At the federal level, Obama had a partial term as senator. Before that, he was a Chicago politician and "community activist," which means professional grievance promoter and agitator.

Some people have business experience, that is, unlike lifelong politicians, they've had to make a payroll, evaluate profit and loss, navigate government regulations, and plan around growth and product development. You'd *think* that politicians would be conversant in government regulations, but they exempt themselves. That is, for example, OSHA doesn't apply so the unpaid interns (note that $0 per hour is definitely less than minimum wage) are subject to tripping hazards over extension cords running all over and fire risk from overuse of outlets...things that would get a *company* a fine or shut down.

That doesn't mean I think that Donald Trump's experience warrants voting for him, but experience in private enterprise (for *someone*) would,be preferable to decades of nothing but politics.

I was in 5th grade in 1971. Feel young again?

Also, part of "making it" involves being able,to take criticism and outright rejection, even more so if you're trying to not just be a professional singer but to be an "idol." All I could think was "what an ass" and wonder how he'd fare in auditions for non-Idol singing jobs.

Me too...I just love DP, either doing it or watching movies about it.

Wait...you meant the other one, didn't you?

Edison is a better bet for this question. He made most of his successes by trial and error, until the failures ruled out all the stuff that wouldn't work leaving only what would. Plus, a significant portion of his accomplishments happened to be...."appropriated" from others. People act like Bill Gares is a genius, but he was great at assembling a team of top software writers and "getting there first" with an OS that became the de facto standard. He offered Internet Explorer for free with Windows, which really undercut Netscape's market share because they charged some nominal price.