Comments

1. Do you have a citation for that 1-in-4-women-who-walk-across-a-parking-lot-will-get-assaulted claim?
2. You are exaggerating the amount of police who will dismiss an obvious assault.
3. Women's razors are more expensive because the polymers used in the larger head and on the grip so it doesn't slip in the shower are more expensive to produce. If this doesn't matter to you, use men's razors.
4. People will generally take your complaints seriously if you make an attempt not to act hysterical. This is statistically harder for women to do.
5. Your opinion likely doesn't matter because you're not very smart. At least that's what I gather from you post.

So either women and people of color are right and have no place in those roles, in which case there actually isn't a problem, or they're wrong and simply need a better mindset. Neither of those scenarios are discriminatory against women or people of color. As to those who feel inadequate, either they're right and should quit, or they're wrong and should have toughed it out.
Either way, the wage gap of 80 some odd cents on the dollar we hear about definitely doesn't take into account all those factors I listed in my first post, so it's obvious that at least a portion of that gap is not caused by discrimination. I suppose what tends to get stuck in my craw is that the number doesn't represent how big the problem is, but people keep assuming it does.

I've seen that episode of Last Week Tonight (and just watched the segment again on youtube). Nowhere in that segment does he (or anyone) provide evidence that women are payed less than men for the same specific job. He also just jokes about the evidence supplied by the opposing view and skips past them to make his point. In general, it's not a good idea to reference comedy shows for this stuff. The one interesting thing in the segment was that study where professors were given identical resumes, one labeled John and the other Jennifer and John was preferred, however I'm willing to guess the sample size was quite tiny, so I would hesitate to draw any solid conclusions from it.
As to your second paragraph, there's nothing wrong with men seeing men in power and wanting to follow suite, so the problem seems to be the mindset of the women. To fill a role of power and/or domination, you have to be powerful and/or dominant. (con't)

Except this rule isn't real. People of different levels of attractiveness get together all the time.

The wage gap is a result of women doing less/cheaper work than men. Women take far more maternity leave than men take paternity leave, men have a higher tendency to work over time and/or weekends, men have a higher tendency to take career paths with higher earning potential like sciences and trades, were women have a higher tendency to take less lucrative paths like the liberal arts, and men are much more likely to take jobs that pay more because they are hazardous. These and other factors like these are the reason men make more money than women, not discrimination between genders.

I think you mean misandrists.

So you can dump your problem on someone else instead of dealing with you own shit yourself?

Christ sake, man up a little bit will you? Everyone is such a wuss nowadays.

You are aware this changes depending on where you live right? For instance where I live, by the winter solstice the sun is below the horizon by 4:30.

Sportsmanship ruins sports. If your team can obliterate the other team there shouldn't be any reason not to do so.

It's not that there aren't winners or losers it's that winning isn't important.

And they're wrong. Even legally you can make up a word and give it any pronunciation you want. Saying "ghoti" and "fish" are homonyms is, while technically accurate as that word has no concrete pronunciation, stupid, and only funny to stupid people.

No it's not. Once you hit the age of majority you are a man. It's that simple. Don't let women's bullshit fool you. Unless you're a woman, in which case fuck off with your bullshit.

Yeah, but it's wrong and not funny.

Not how it works. If a girl bought a dildo and taped it to her pants she'd still get arrested for it. The only difference would likely be the charge wouldn't be indecent exposure.

There's nothing in the law that says that only women can commit indecent exposure with their breasts. It's reasonable to assume that the average person would be offend by him showing his very female-like breasts, therefore the charge of indecent exposure would likely be deemed reasonable.

The bible begs to differ.

Her apartment is much smaller.

Because it's funny.

Chill bro, that kind of thinking is what starts wars.

Chill, dude, it's just a story.

The end of the video says that her symptoms aren't usually that bad. She was apparently exhausted at the time.

How do you figure he did it to become popular? He posted it on an anonymous image board.

*two or three countries

Oh, come on. People always go on about how part of going to school is to learn social skills and work ethic. I don't know if it's always been that way, but it certainly was all through my schooling.

Fuck Quebec

Only idiots take life lessons from horror movies.

What?

Oh no, a place with a lot of people that smells like people. Harden up, pansy.

Implying people should indulge your lack of patience.

It doesn't have to be right to be funny.

>There's a line that shouldn't be crossed with humor
Yeah, if your a puss.

Prank or not, it's still funny.

No, it's stupid and right.

I'd love to hear a duet with both.

Probably those rockets on the bottom.