User correct3 Banned

Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
See, you just proved your own logic faulty. If we just needed some 'fact' (even though these don't have much likelihood being facts) lists to prove something right, then I could just fake some 'facts' too. Thanks for proving my point.
Stash 8 27 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Sure, let's close it to everyone. I personally don't really care. It's just the whole 'all Muslims are terrorists' ideology that could cause problems in the future, not only for Muslims, but for everyone.
· Edited 8 years ago
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Well, you're not able to provide 20 distinct reasons as to why that would be the case, so that theory is out the window. Please suggest something that you can give 20 distinct and logical/verifiable reasons for.
Stash 8 27 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Yea but why close borders to a specific group? If a Muslim president (you'd probably kill yourself if we had a Muslim president) closed immigration to all Christians, there'd be a HUGE uproar.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
I don't sit and watch furries have sex. However, since I know of the stupid cringe shit they do, they obviously make their kinks quite public. How do you think I even know about the existence of furries? The fact that I, a person who never intended to learn about cringy animal fuckers, did learn what furries were, makes it obvious that they DONT just keep to themselves in bed. And that they are public/open with their kinks mean that they also understand that they are open to ridicule as well. Also, I'm not separately trying to find holes in your argument, I'm just arguing with someone who refuses to use an adult mindset. How is it that you don't understand that not being able to come up with 20 distinct reasons for something does not make that thing false? Hell, Nobody can give 20 distinct reasons as to why gravity exists/works, but that doesn't mean it doesn't.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
@matthewg the last question you asked was: "So what you're saying is that furries are fair game and may be mistreated, simply based on the fact that they like to dress up in the bedroom?" And I answered that pretty directly. But if you don't understand my answer, here it is: furries are fair game just as any person or group is. The fact that they dress up in the bedroom (and very very often, in public and on social media) makes me target them more than say, Buddhist monks.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Just because you're referencing a really old election doesn't mean you're any more educated than a child who knows how to use wikipedia. Regardless, here is my statement: you have the ability to ask of me to give you as many reasons as you want. Just because I cannot give you 20,30,50,100,3000 reasons as to why I am not man, does not mean that I am man. It's a very simple concept to wrap your mind around. I am openly admitting right now that I don't have the time to come up with 20 distinct reasons as to why I am not Man. However, if you truly believe that this guarantees that I am indeed Man, then you seriously need to get an education.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Also reju is a retard who thinks their comments are somehow insulting me
· Edited 8 years ago
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Bookhoarder I specifically said you'd ask for 10 more to show how arbitrary your behaviour is, not because I easily have 10 more reasons in store. Do you know what arbitrary means? Read my example about 1+1. Also, a lot of the reasons you gave me about why you are not rwby are not hard facts but assumptions.
· Edited 8 years ago
Stash 8 27 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
@pokethebear that's exactly what I was referencing.
Stash 8 27 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
a ban in itself is unconstitutional though. plus, there are already many citizens in the US who can also choose to become terrorists, liek the orlando shooter. Should we create Muslim internment camps until we 'know what the people's attitude is'?
5
Stash 8 27 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Yes he did. Even though the judge was American, and just ethnically Mexican.
12
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Actually things have cooled down considerably, especially since @bookhoarder can't respond at all now that I not only explained the flaw in his logic AND provided 5 extra reasons (although I had no obligation to). It's basically a checkmate rn.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
I guess you are..... correct (ba-dum tshh)
2 · Edited 8 years ago
Should we learn taxes... 16 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
1. Ask parent how to 2. Use google
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
@matthewg I'm not exercising my freedom for freedoms sake, I'm just stating what I believe. Also, unlike some fools here, I realize that comments on a tiny image sharing website don't have ANY impact on the world, and anyone who lets something from this site affect their real lives are really really stupid.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Now I bet you're gonna ask for 10 more reasons, because you can't understand logic. @bookhoarder
· Edited 8 years ago
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
(continued, just in case you can't understand that) Post or comment.
10. Man would post original content, created by himself using Photoshop, while I post images I find online.
· Edited 8 years ago
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
In response to your edit: if I was trying to break free of my past, I would not act in a way that is comparable to how man acts. Also, I would not admit that I respect him, which I do. Again, your choice of the number 10 is completely arbitrary. What makes 10 reasons more valuable than 5? Why didn't you ask for 20 reasons? Read my explanation above. Can you tell me specifically 10 DISTINCT reasons as to why you are not, for example, rwby_rose? Anyway, although my above claims are completely justified and explained, someone as unintelligent as you will also need the following:
6. Man used a different ban evasion method: he used different emails
7. Man would get banned instantly regardless of his name/account simply due to being able to be tracked through IP.
8. Man distinctly specified that he didn't use any IP changers or VPNs, I do.
9. Man was far less moderate than I, and would start fights on his own volition. Unlike him, the arguments I cause start based on someone else's
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Ok, then. Give me 5 reasons, then another 5 reasons as to why 1 + 1 = 2. It's something really obvious, and doesn't need too many explanations. In fact, giving 10 non-synonymous explanations for this thing can be difficult. However, not being able to give 10 reasons as to why 1+1 = 2, does not mean that 1+1 doesn't equal 2. So, just because I can't give some arbitrarily large amount of reasons as to why I am not man, does not mean that I am man.
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
I said I was done here, but I think it's ok insult whoever the fuck you want. I'll be fine if you tell me that people who find enjoyment in coming back to funsubstance after they've been banned (me) are disgusting freaks who deserve to die. If I'm mentally sound, I wouldn't care what you think anyway. So, I think everyone is fair game on the internet. It's not like I'm going out and clubbing them or anything.
How is this even possible 60 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Ok then his wife is more stupid than is humanly possible. Why the fuck didn't she run away when he fucking woke up? Idk if I understand this but didn't she also hide the bloody rags? I hadn't taken into account that such stupid people could possibly exist, please excuse my first comment.
7
Stash 3 97 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
It's over, you're a bit late.
How is this even possible 60 comments
correct3 · 8 years ago
Sure, he could have survived, he could have passed out from the shock, but he would DEFINITELY have noticed a huge hole and a fuckton of blood. 100% fake. 0/10 shit story.
21