You've also probably have never seen a fucking playpen in your life

@slamdunkey

You should say what you're commenting in reply to cuz it looks rlly random out in the open by itself like this

Yea chu ur off topic

I'm sorry but that is offensive to mindless-kin people, check your privilege.

I wish we were like that still

Just get an account lmao. A guest's words usually have no value here cuz if they believed in what they were saying they'd stop being anonymous

In a picture u need perfect shutter speed and fan speed otherwise it looks like a single murky color

Yea if you use violence you're admitting you're wrong cuz u have nothing else to say

Yea sometimes these tumblrs are so fucking gullible

You're obviously more pure cuz u only do that to pictures of cartoon horses

Again, should have said that BEFORE engaging in an argument

Ok matthewg

Oh you're THAT guest. Great. Please excuse me while I throw up my lungs. God, you're one of the most vile idiots I've ever seen on this site. When's your fucking expiration date already?

No he's *stille 20

i guess you're right there, although I did feel he sort of ran out of things to present, hence the switch to source blaming. But again, you're right. There's no winning or losing, I just didn't really know how to word it. 'save face', maybe? Idk

yea. though he could easily have used google to find it himself so i think his request was more of a subject change or an 'avoid-having-to-give-up' ploy.

yea, I agree that the info given wasn't the best, but when you start a discussion based on a certain material, you shouldn't back out near the end and push all blame to the article. But yea, the site sucks and we should have been given a more unbiased and well documented news source to begin with, but all the talk that went about here was based more or less on the above post.

ok, sure. But you shouldn't speak of ego (btw what's mental ego) if you're unable to at least admit that you are not capable of explaining your worldview properly. Cuz really, most people on this site are more alligned with the type of mindset that is against lethal gun use, and also are more likely than not to support the BLM cause (imo). But since you were unable to eloquently convey your thoughts and ideas properly, instead resorting to some weak exaggerated examples, then blaming the article for being bad, then asking for someone to link you to a better news source (the latter two of which you should have done BEFORE it became obvious that you were on the losing side of the debate). So I mean, you have the right to imply that im egotistical, but let's not forget that you still aren't gracefully admitting that you were at least incapable of conveying your point. IMO, you're the one who's being egotistical rn. But again, that's fine. Whatever floats your boat.