That depends on the camera. For instance, speed cameras snap a picture using instantaneous detection, so it's pretty likely he was actually going faster than the camera was programmed to ignore if one of these got him. Then there are so-called red light cameras, these will snap a pic as soon as the car passes and hits the switch under the asphalt, no matter what your speed. There's lots of cameras that will just go off continuously depending on the trigger since a human will be double-checking the pictures.

It's possible. The cameras go off when cars trigger them under certain conditions (like certain speeds, or a trigger under the asphalt that reads the car's weight passing). My sister got one in the mail for turning on red at an intersection where it wasn't allowed and they tacked on a ticket for no seatbelt. The camera just takes a shit ton of amazingly clear pictures all day, humans look at them and send out tickets for spotted violations. You could spot the color of my sister's eyes in this picture they sent, there was no way of claiming it wasn't her.

Nah, I'm gonna stick with my interpretation.

ISIS claimed the attack, but did so using incorrect descriptions of what happened. It's something they seem to do. Claiming attacks they didn't do gives a false view of them as all-reaching and bolsters their reputation even as they lose ground. It's a tactic.

Yes, but the post was specifically Republican. But yeah, I live in a heavily Democratic place and hoo boy are our officials thieves.

Dependa on the reasons. You can't sue for more than worker's comp will cover in an injury case. It's an at-will state so you can't sue just for being fired. But there are things NY law will let you sue for if you can prove them...discrimination, sexual harassment, violating whistleblower protection, etc.

But but but...there's a FEMALE who has CONFIDENCE and that is tHrEaTeNiNg and sCaRy to guest! It must be denounced! Burn the witch!

I didn't say "men might kill their kids." I said that people MALE AND FEMALE who are in a place where suicide is a valid answer for them may be at a higher risk of taking the kids with them. And again...nobody is going to wake up and say "I'm going to kill myself because I can't see my kids" if they are emotionally stable. Those ones that do are not doing it STRICTLY because they can't see their kids. Know why? IF YOU COMMIT SUICIDE YOU SCAR YOUR CHILDREN AND THEY NEVER SEE YOU AGAIN. You are NOT rationally realizing this if you are considering suicide, if you're considering suicide you are in a VERY dark place. You're thinking about YOU, about YOUR pain. A judgement against you may be a trigger, but it isn't an underlying reason or cause. This ad takes men and says "males are 2 dimensional, stupid, and not complex. Divorce courts hurt their feelings and they kill themselves, case closed."

I don't think you know very much about suicide if you think so. Mentally healthy people don't commit suicide, they cobtinue fighting for custody and if they lose then they wait for their kids to hit 18 and try to mend bridges. If you wake up one morning and see literally no bright spots in your life and decide to kill yourself then custody may be a contributing trigger but it is NOT the reason. And if somebody has no bright spots in their life, you don't want to trust them with children. Men and women both commit murder suicide on their kids because they're in a dark place where suicide is any kind of answer.

It may also just have important documents that need to be grabbed in case of fire/flood/evacuation. The safe itself may be water and/or fireproof in case it's not safe to go and grab on the way out.

Yeah, it did. Go ask a Yazidi girl in the Middle East what it's like. We'll wait.

Or finding something really nice on Etsy. "Who am I wearing? Some Junior from Ohio with actual taste."