Make both hands pointer fingers, incline your head down slightly, then alternate raising and lowering your pointer fingers. First do it on the left side of your body, then your right, and repeat. You can also do middle.
It looks like you’re doing a little dance, very understated, but basking in their deserved primary focus of celebrating you.
What it *really* looks like is like you found something to do/a way to participate during the song, which is very fantastic and people will think you’re awesome. Based on if you have a friendly/ accommodating/dramatic personality, or not, is how big to make the motions, and what to do with your face.
Also, you can do this with a completely bored face. That should cut down on it occurring again, because it looks like you’re politely performing interest in the face of something 100% uninteresting.
This works better than conducting the singing, which feels wrong for several reasons, and which deters no one from future recurrence.

WTH. If this is a real sign on a real wall, this legally constitutes harassment. I’m not a side character or a sex object to be discussed in the third person in my presence. I just - no. No, no, no, no, no. NO. NOT COOL.

Is this the standard operating procedure for the company? Was s/he looking for a reason not to hire the candidate? Is the candidate going to be in a super sensitive position or company in relation to PR? OP “tried” a Google search of his face. Doesn't sound like this is something s/he does regularly so possibly s/he’s setting different bars for candidates.
Even if it’s standard procedure, it’s a little concerning that s/he would posted publicly. S/he stripped out identifying info (yes, good) but this could cause issues. It’s not a good match for company so focused on perception to have that type of person making decisions.
I think s/he’s is not following standard procedure. Here’s the thing: there are laws and regulations for this stuff. I hope this person is running decisions by someone else, and has oversight. Unless s/he’s a one-person show or at a very tiny company, this potentially provides a way worse picture of the OP than the candidate.

But also! Reality is both incredibly beautiful and depressing. Like, part of understanding the world accurately is developing a baseline of depression from seeing it clearly.

Great. Now we have TWO English speaking leaders whose coverage largely consists of their pathetic excuse for adult behavior. I *just* want leadership who focuses on the job they’re paid to do with appreciation for the country, intelligence and everyday civility. Like, it’s the lowest of bars after clearing truly unacceptable leadership. And now we have TWO people who clearly struggle with it.

My favorite part is the five fingers attached to her arm.

I don’t get it. Help, pls?

Because ‘why the hell not?’ needs a deadline. Either she’s interested in him or she’s bored in general. Either way, gotta move things along.

“Imagine the company you have a contract with goes out of business and Boom you’re not a model anymore.”
Hating an online version of hustling or making money is stupid. If an analog/real world/offline equivalent doesn’t net the same derision, you’re just being bratty about technology.

Okay, but: maybe what you say is ignorant and you are being called on it. Complaining that someone has a different perspective - which they attempted to explain - is maybe not the best look.

Yikes. Don’t smile, doofus!

Ok - why is HR monitoring performance? That’s a supervisor’s job. If HR is managing the secretary, it’s possible, I guess. But still odd!
What performance metrics does the secretary have? Why use such an antiquated term, anyway? Admin, Office Manager, plenty of other titles that don’t bring to mind typewriters.
Yes, support your people. Certainly, be transparent in staffing decisions. Definitely if there is a poor fit, correct it. Still and nonetheless: This post has some odd elements.

Help Plant Clean

“You seem to be upset. While this is an unfortunate reaction and is in no way a reflection on me, I will be patient with it.”

Sir. SIR.

Well, *this* white person doesn’t identify with a particular country of origin, nor do any of the other white people I know.
Side note: Most third+ generation Americans I know don’t think of themselves in that context. If they do, it’s usually because someone has made them by trying to insist they have some sort of outsider status. I see insistence in this way as insisting on *accurate* racism. Yes, would be better if no racism, but we’ll continue to have it (because stupid losers yearn for an insider advantage their competence can’t earn). “At least be accurate in knowing where I’m from if you’re going to say I should go back.”
Look: If someone cares where they are from, give them the respect of noticing. If they don’t, it’s no insult not to do so.
You’re parsing something that’s generally considered unimportant [edit: in US] to belittle people taking pride in their heritage. Be at peace, if you care about your heritage, with others who do the same.

What?

How do they get registered?