Okay. I've given it some thought and decided to engage. What is this exact problem with false accusations? I mentioned the enormous difference in statistical likelihood. I will jump the gun a little and say if your point is that any false claim invalidates the ability to trust statistics, two things. (1.) The whole point of gathering and viewing statistics is to get a true sense of representative reality. What is the most likely thing based on a big enough sample size to know? Trying to compare apples to apples - one claim against another - circumvents that entire issue and the net result inevitably is that a pebble invalidates a mountain. (2) If that is what you are saying, then my answer is the same: You believe in justice, as do I. You just don't like reality and want it to be very different than what it is. To be fair, I also am not a fan of reality. It's full of very unfun statistics.