And you? Into the "spreading freedom" and "defending the US"?

And isn't it a sign of how destroyed these times are that you're getting downvoted for this? Evidence has no meaning any longer, just repeatedly claim something in the media, you'll find somebody to believe you.

I mean I heard about objectification of women, but womenistation of objects goes too far with me

You're really bringing the fun back to funsubstance

Cringe stock: November has been proclaimed men's health month and nutting is the best testicular and prostate cancer prophylaxis and premature Internet kids think it's a good idea to make a no nut challenge.

Changing your diet away from carbs is firstly lowering your insulin production (as you stated, they're sugars). Beside splitting up sugars one of the most crucial functions of insulin is to trigger fat storage.
As carbs won't be available for energy production and insulin levels sink, your body starts to produce energy from stored fat and consumed proteins, which isn't done in the bowel, but in the liver. A low carb diet normally is based in a significantly increased protein intake, so that said, your metabolism is forced into a rather radical change.
The increased availability of proteins will then, alongside with physical movement aka sports, result in muscle growth and the more muscle you have, the more calories you burn, even when resting.
To conclude: if you strictly follow a low-carb diet, you don't need to cut calories to improve your bodily aesthetics.

There's a significant point you're missing: collateral damage.