Except that their helmets are just as famous if not more so than most "famous" faces. So that argument doesnt really work. I don't care 1 way or another for them, just saying that arguments weak
I think the difference is that since only "the helmets" are famous it helps the people behind the helmet remain unaffected by the fame and that's what they're trying to do. Most people would have no idea if they actually ran into the people behind the helmets so they can still enjoy making music for the sake of music and not for the sake of being recognized and idolized by the public.
Ha! 80's? Oh loyalty? Please! That ain't a big deal dude... To be honest I don't even like them! They don't make songs about anything meaningful nor smart most of the time... Wanna talk about royalty? Check out idk, Beatles! Two of their members are so fucking dead! And the keep winning!!! Maaan, now that's what you call real music, innovative and revolutionary music... Ha! Daft punk... Ask ozzy, Paul McCartney, a member of a real badass band what they think of them... Sorry little fellas but daft punk, as it turns out, ain't the shit of nothin... They could be like a really small poop that you see along the road from some homeless man that couldn't hold it and didn't have we're to go... Sweet vision huh? Haha hope you get what I'm saying ma mates! Laaateer....
Comments