Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
songofthewhitestag
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
Toys don't have to be marked "boys" or "girls." Maybe, one day we'll live in a world where they aren't.
36
guest
· 10 years ago
I thought they already aren't. ..people just choose to categorize them..
24
songofthewhitestag
· 10 years ago
Y'know, a bit over a century ago, the colors were reversed. Blue was considered a soft, feminine color, and pink was considered a strong masculine color.
11
guest
· 10 years ago
Blue and pink together (lavender) was also once the pride color of homosexuals, nary a rainbow to be found.
3
nightkami
· 10 years ago
Barbies didn't have enough articulation points for my liking.
10
storytimeninja
· 10 years ago
I played with my sister's barbie dolls cause my action figures needed girlfriends
22
casey1895
· 10 years ago
Lol I did the same thing except my barbies needed boyfriends
16
guest
· 10 years ago
Why can't toys be toys and entertain our children?
10
glittergrimreaper
· 10 years ago
My brother likes to play dolls he's not gay song of the white stag is right lets not have genderized toys
3
impanda222
· 10 years ago
*beef cake*
2
guest
· 10 years ago
I think the logic follows that the child might want to grow up to be like the doll/action figure. Though toys shouldn't be stereotyped, the logic does make sense.
▼
songofthewhitestag
· 10 years ago
Not really. There are plenty of young boys who grow up with either one and it doesn't change them. Toys are for all genders unless operated by your genitalia. In that case, they're not for children anyway.
4
thethirdi
· 10 years ago
I never had action figures. I had legos and dinos. Good times.
2
pixiedust
· 10 years ago
pixiedust
· 10 years ago
Sorry wrong post.
▼
