Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
deleted
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
I unlogged and loged in again just to like this twice
32
lucifer
· 10 years ago
I mean, if you actually own the fucking wall you paint that at or buy a canvas.. Then you good. I hate modern art with a passion, though.
44
deleted
· 10 years ago
Art is a wide-ranging and nigh on all-encompassing subject - for some the top is art, for others not; the same can be said for the bottom image (depending on how you view street art/graffiti/vandalism). It's all a matter of personal taste and understanding - so hey, if people are allowed to like a flavour of ice cream and dislike another, why isn't it acceptable for people to do like/dislike different types of art?
5
guest
· 10 years ago
I once saw a canvas with a slit in it selling for 100,000 dollars. Modern art is NOT art.
7
jimbles_notronbo
· 10 years ago
It depends on how you look at it.
guest
· 10 years ago
Why not both? Fiesta ensues.
6
lucifer
· 10 years ago
Fiesta fiesta pluma pluma gay
4
hannah321
· 10 years ago
*Unpopular opinion* It is vandalism if the person did it without permission of the building owner, despite how beautiful it is!
31
smiley101
· 10 years ago
My thoughts exactly. But personally, i live graffitti art.
sandysue
· 10 years ago
Graffitti doesn't directly mean vandalism. Any kind of art is vandalism when it damages public/private property on purpose..
smiley101
· 10 years ago
I know. But i meant i love the way its drawn, i like the design of it.
beyondtheriverbend
· 10 years ago
I can't stop admiring the vandal one. So beautiful
2
deleted
· 10 years ago
All art is a matter of perspective. No two people have the same concept of whats considered real art and what isn't. But, the question of vandalism vs art is that unless you own what you're painting on then thats against the law. You must have permission or own the property for it to be legal.
2
guest
· 10 years ago
it's all in the opinion of the artist. its up to them if its art or not. why if you're a boy then someone tells you you're a girl would you accept that you're a girl? same applies no matter what you say to the artist if he claim its art then its art it the artist claim its vandalism it's vandalism.
pierrorocher
· 10 years ago
Looks like Alice Pasquini work. (the graffiti btw)
▼
guest
· 10 years ago
The "vandalism picture", which I personally consider to be extremely kitschy, may have never existed without Mark Rothko (Picture on top) or Lucio Fontana (canvas with a slit), who attempted to question terms like art, canvas, color, and so on. You might consider the mentioned "vandalism picture" both art and vandalism or neither. I might add that works by "Banksy" are IMHO far superior to this one. Sorry for my bad English, I am both German and drunk ;)
1
guest
· 10 years ago
hate me = fuck you
▼
guest
· 10 years ago
Location! Location! Location!
guest
· 10 years ago
are you a dead terrorist?
▼
guest
· 10 years ago
if you did not want it to be called vandalism, you should not have painted it on a wall where you had no permition to paint
katkatie
· 10 years ago
Really, it doesn't matter how beautiful the painting is or how talented the person was, if it's not their property then it is vandalism if they didn't get permission from the person or who owns the wall or wherever it is