Thunder storms can be freaky

Obviously not as big as yours, given you're deleting your comments.

I deleted one. Don't be a dick, man. Now at least back up your statement so we can try to see it from your perspective

Deleting AND totally editing your comments, what a star you are. And I don't understand what statement you want me to back up?

I never said I was a star. I never raised myself above you. You call the tumblr statement fake. That's fine and dandy. Just back it up. If you don't want to then you didn't have to say anything

You say it's true - why don't *you* back it up? The burden of proof falls to you, after all.

This is getting good

I never called it true or fake. Even if it's fake, I wonder what would've happened. You're making up stuff to avoid answering something that you started. That's like saying hi to someone you haven't seen in years and then just walking away. You need to realize that i never said that it was true or fake. And you're acting like deleting a comment makes you less of a person.

You're trying to pin on me what you did.

This is better than the post

Yeah, it is. I'm not joking. It's quite laughable seeing him try to respond,

I don't even know what you're on about now - "You're trying to pin on me what you did."? You're the one who deleted their comments so it looked like I was talking to myself; you're the one who edited your comment to change every word of it.
As for saying if it's true or false, your first comment implies you believe the post to be true. Though I don't even know why you've gotten your knickers in such a twist from me calling it BS.

Ain't nobody care about who deletes or edits comments. LOL

*sighs* you don't get it. I'm going to try to explain my point. I never called it true or false. You randomly called it false and now suddenly you can't defend your point. Deleting comments had nothing to do with it. Are you going to prove your point or just keep talking to me about me deleting and editing my comments...? And thank you guest.

And, I didn't edit every word, and I didn't delete my comment to make you seem like you were talking to yourself. Don't be a dumbass. Stop guessing at things you don't have a fucking answer to. I deleted the comment because I was embarrassed at all of my dislikes. I edited my comment for content because A. I didn't want to get dislikes again, and B., because there were too many swears and I didn't want to incite a flame war. Now, like I said, I don't care if it's true or fake. I never called it true or fake. You called it fake and can't get a reason. I didn't say either so I don't NEED a reason. All /I/ said originally was I wonder what would happen if the lightning didn't happen. Fiction books aren't real, but what happens if someone wonders if Percy was a girl? What if Simba would've been a girl? TLK is fake, but I can't wonder about something like that without being criticized? Really? What if Wall-E's pet was a spider? What if Woody didn't exist? What if the Titanic didn't sink?

Obviously I have no way to prove it's untrue, but just reading it is enough to work out it's bull (it fits all of Tumblr's favourite tropes). There is also no way to prove it is true - so, like Schrödinger's cat, I think we'll have to agree to disagree and settle that the story is both true and false, eh?
On a separate note though: deleting and totally editing comments after people have replied to them is pretty poor show - calling you out on doing so doesn't make me the 'dick' or 'dumbass'. You *did* edit every word of your second comment, and you deleted your first comment after I had already replied. You shouldn't be embarrassed about dislikes if your comment is how your feel, and you shouldn't delete a comment for fear of dislikes - you should be able to stand by what you say, no matter how people respond.
(By the way - the Titanic wasn't a fictional event, like all the other examples you listed.)

And, if you're determined to continue this, then at least refer to me with the correct pronoun - I'm a she.

Oh shut up. I know the Titanic isn't fictional. I was using it as my point. Your point seems to be that you can't make a statement about something funny and wonder about it without being criticized. However your previous comment means that this whole argument was pointless, since you're obviously too impaired in the mind to make a statement against something without backing it up, and then calling the person defending the thing/person that you are arguing against sarcastic names. I can't believe you did this; if you're going to start something, you need to back it up, or you don't have anything to build your basis upon, like building a house on a swamp, otherwise you look like a dumbfuck and a jerk.

You specifically said you were discussing fictional things then included the Titanic in a list along with Lion King and Wall-E - it sure looked like you thought it was fictional.
I didn't find the story funny, hence I pointed out I think it's BS. "Too impaired in the mind"? Puh-lease. There's no way to prove this is false because it IS false. There is no evidence because nothing happened.
I honestly don't know why you're taking this so personally. I would also not say I was trying to "start something" with my comment; I was simply saying I disbelieved the post.
I would like to emphasis that I have not called you a sarcastic name throughout this whole discussion (I do not find name-calling helpful to an argument). However, you have called me several (por ejemplo: "dumbfuck", "jerk", "dumbass", "dick").

You are simply too stupid to try to hold a conversation with.

The feeling is mutual.

Then why are we still talking?

This was a wild ride from start to finish

Wow... bestargument I have ever read