I weigh 100lbs and have double Ds so I do believe thats not an accurate statement...I get thats not always the case...I guess thats all uhm don't hate cuz I slightly disagree :(
Bunny for your love?
()_()
(=',')()
()(l)(l)
Different person, but I agree with guest. And what does it being a joke have to do with anything? I could punch someone say that it was just a joke but that doesn't excuse what I did.
No it's not. Just like being skinny isn't healthy. It can be healthy, but it isn't automatically. Your health and your body is a lot more complex than fat = unhealthy and skinny = healthy, despite what Fox News may tell you.
No-one said being skinny is healthy. Though it may not be okay to "shame" someone (I.e make fun of them) for being overweight, pointing out that its unhealthy isn't wrong. Being overweight isn't healthy.
No, it's not. Jesus christ. I dare to you go to the great trouble of a google search and look up Olympic athletes, particularly women in the weight-lifting section, and then tell me that being fat is unhealthy.
They're not fat. They're bulked up for the sport in which they take part. They're keeping fit too. If you compare their "fat" or body mass to the average "fat" person you'll see that there's more muscle than actual fat.
Do you know nothing?
Okay, for the sake of your illogical argument, let's say these women aren't fat. Guess what? Seeing as the rest of the human world does see them as fat, they're treated as such. They're harassed, bullied, etc. So the socialization is still the same.
Also: there are skinny people who stay skinny no matter how much they eat even if they never exercise, are you really telling me you don't believe that the reverse can be true?
Illogical? Do you know any weightlifter who doesn't bulk up? Have you ever been to a gym? If they were skinny they wouldn't be in the weightlifting competition, and if their "fat" was the same as the average fat person, then what's stopping the average fat person from competeing in similar events? The difference is that the weightlifters keep to a strict diet, do your research.
And if the perceptions of the rest of the world hasn't bothered them, or stopped them from competing, then what's the problem? They're fitter than most women (or even men).
Everyones metabolism slows down at some point. But there's no way that you can't lose weight (there was a post about this a while ago). It may be harder for some people, but everyone can lose weight with dieting and exercise. It just takes commitment and dedication.
Good lord, did you not hear me? I said for the sake of your argument, let's pretend that these women aren't fat: the socialization is still the same.
Did you just say what's stopping fat people from competing in the Olympics when: 1.) there are fat people who compete in the Olympics you're just jumping through hoops because you don't want to accept that you can be healthy and fat and 2.) that's like me asking why aren't there more average skinny people in the Olympics. Why isn't my neighbor in the Olympics? (Hint: it's because it's the fucking Olympics.)
Also, how the fuck do you know how the perceptions from the rest of the world has affected them? Like, how do you even think you know? It most likely has, but they still competed in the Olympics. Jesus christ.
Fine, honey. Believe what you want to believe even though it goes against reality and modern (unbiased) science, but you're right. You think whatever your precious self wants to think.
*sigh* excuses burn zero calories.
Olympic weighlifters TRAIN for the event, even under the fat, they have far more muscle than the average "fat" person. They eat appropriately, their fat isn't because of an unhealthy lifestyle. Who cares about socializations? People need to stop blaming "society" for their problems. Comparing a fat olypmic competitor to the average fat person is like comparing a monster-truck to a prius. The olympic competitor is fit because they train for the event, that's the point I'm making, if your neighbor put in the effort and trained, hell yeah, they could compete too.
How do you know that it has? They could be not giving a damn about society for all you know.
Have you even done your research properly? Or are you believeing whatever makes you feel comfortable with your self? EVERYONE is capable of losing weight, unless its a one in a million case where they have a serious genetic defect. Yes, its a lot harder for some people to lose weight, but in the end
It is possible. Like I said, excuses burn zero calories. It takes a determined effort to lose weight, it takes time, effort and sacrifices, but it sure as hell works. And exercise works far better than complaining on the internet, making excuses and blaming society for being effed up instead of doing something about your problems.
Based off of what sources, honey? Lemme guess, your brain! Aw, you actually think you're coming up with all of this on your own. That's so cute.
Think of socialization this way: we see Peter Parker complain about being bullied and about not "getting" Mary Jane and such and we sympathize with him because bullying sucks. It's similar. Fat people are socialized to believe that they're less desirable, unhealthy, that they should do anything and everything possible to get smaller, etc. Peter Parker was socialized to know that his bully was the one with all the power and that he couldn't stand up for himself and he was programmed to have low self-esteem for a while. The same goes for fat people. But of course you only care about the skinny white guys.
Anyways, how do you know the average fat person's fitness routine? Despite your ignorance and denial, it is possible to be fat and healthy and eat healthy and exercise. Funnily enough, I've actually seen it in the flesh. Like I said, your bod
Like I said, your body and health are more complex than your microscopic understand of fat = unhealthy and skinny = healthy.
Also: do you not understand how the Olympics work.
Woo, that's why I said "most likely." Because it's rare for someone not to be affected by media constantly telling you that being skinny is beautiful and good while being fat is ugly and bad. Especially if you're a woman where beauty standards are heightened. It's like if the media constantly told you having six fingers is normal and fine while having five fingers is bad and abnormal, you're going to grow up insecure about your fingers and your hand if you have five fingers. Of course, it's rather the opposite in reality.
I have done research: 1.) listening to actual unbiased doctors and medical professionals rather than random dweebs 2.) listening to fat people share their experiences 3.) seeing fat people that were fat but ate healthy and exercised 4.) reeducated myself and realizing that just because Fox News or CNN or whoever says that being fat is unhealthy, that doesn't mean they're right. I mean, it's Fox News for god's sake.
Anyways, even if they were excuses, you're right: losing weight takes a lot of work and energy and money that some people don't have. So should they spare their energy because they have to go to work, should they spend their time with their kids, should they buy the cheaper groceries that they can actually afford, or should they worry about your basic opinions? Being fat has many social complexities behind it that you're failing to see because of, I'm assuming, your privilege.
Like, your average McDonald's menu, you can get a burger and fries for two dollars (ish) or a salad for six dollars. If you're broke as hell, like many people, which are you gonna choose. Also: the burger and fries provides more calories and thus more energy for people who have to work, a salad provides considerably less calories and less energy which would be bad if they're working.
Even if they were unhealthy, why do you care? You clearly don't care about their health or else you wouldn't be shaming their bodies on the Internet and making up facts. You don't care about their well being, or (again) you wouldn't be shaming their bodies. It doesn't affect you in any way, so why do you care?
Knock it off. You're being condescending and derogatory. You're claiming you've done research but provided no source or studies. At this point it doesn't even matter if I agreed with you, you're a bully who's using a soapbox to hurt others. Every single post I've read of yours is inflammatory, angry, and judgmental, and dripping with passive aggressive sweet talk. People stop listening when you conduct yourself in such a way. You're never going to change people's minds in this way, and are actually hurting any cause you're crusading for.
It doesn't take a shitload of money to be healthy. And as for your rant about CNN and Foxnews (alas, another person blaming the media for their suckish life) I can't be influenced by it because I'm from South Africa. And as such, I've seen people live healthily off a staple diet. As for caring, you know nothing about me. We run a community centre, to help not only undernourished kids, but also over-weight ones, and nothing that I've seen has indicated that being over-weight can be healthy. And trust me, as a genetics student, I understand the human body well enough to know that you're making up stuff to justify your own unhealthiness under the guise of fighting for a cause. Like I said before and I'll continue to say, excuses burn zero calories.
And you've provided no sources either? So why should I listen to anything you have to say? But lalala actual sources!: (http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=91817), (http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/05/can-you-be-fat-and-fit-or-thin-and-unhealthy/). Those are just a couple, I could provide more, but I don't feel like it at the moment. Who knew about science?
Anyways, honey, I guarantee the only reason you're calling me angry, judgmental, etc. even though my opposers are using the same kind of tone and talk, just different views, is because you disagree with me. It's pretty obvious. And if people stop listening to me because they dislike anger, then that's their anger and their immaturity getting in the way. It's not my problem if you're too shallow to listen to an angry person.
Fox News does influence the world. Not in big, obvious ways, but it influences how people (important, influential people included) think and act. So it does affect you indirectly.
Some people don't even have the smallest amount of money. We're in one of the worst recessions the world has ever seen. The economy sucks, people are losing their houses and jobs left and right and they do not have the energy, time, or money to exercise regularly or eat healthy. I know you think this is untrue, but luckily facts are still facts no matter what you think.
Well, philosophic, you can't really get guys clothes because those would be even less accustomed to fit breasts. Though they come in bigger sizes, the bottom wouldn't accommodate a smaller waist ( compared to the breasts )
And women's clothes usually accommodate smaller breasts so no shirt will really fit around them unless it's stretchy or tailored. ( I'm have problems with underwear because they looked alright on the mannequins butt and the package models butt but when I put them on they went half thong)
Bunny for your love?
()_()
(=',')()
()(l)(l)
Okay, for the sake of your illogical argument, let's say these women aren't fat. Guess what? Seeing as the rest of the human world does see them as fat, they're treated as such. They're harassed, bullied, etc. So the socialization is still the same.
Also: there are skinny people who stay skinny no matter how much they eat even if they never exercise, are you really telling me you don't believe that the reverse can be true?
And if the perceptions of the rest of the world hasn't bothered them, or stopped them from competing, then what's the problem? They're fitter than most women (or even men).
Everyones metabolism slows down at some point. But there's no way that you can't lose weight (there was a post about this a while ago). It may be harder for some people, but everyone can lose weight with dieting and exercise. It just takes commitment and dedication.
Did you just say what's stopping fat people from competing in the Olympics when: 1.) there are fat people who compete in the Olympics you're just jumping through hoops because you don't want to accept that you can be healthy and fat and 2.) that's like me asking why aren't there more average skinny people in the Olympics. Why isn't my neighbor in the Olympics? (Hint: it's because it's the fucking Olympics.)
Also, how the fuck do you know how the perceptions from the rest of the world has affected them? Like, how do you even think you know? It most likely has, but they still competed in the Olympics. Jesus christ.
Fine, honey. Believe what you want to believe even though it goes against reality and modern (unbiased) science, but you're right. You think whatever your precious self wants to think.
Olympic weighlifters TRAIN for the event, even under the fat, they have far more muscle than the average "fat" person. They eat appropriately, their fat isn't because of an unhealthy lifestyle. Who cares about socializations? People need to stop blaming "society" for their problems. Comparing a fat olypmic competitor to the average fat person is like comparing a monster-truck to a prius. The olympic competitor is fit because they train for the event, that's the point I'm making, if your neighbor put in the effort and trained, hell yeah, they could compete too.
How do you know that it has? They could be not giving a damn about society for all you know.
Have you even done your research properly? Or are you believeing whatever makes you feel comfortable with your self? EVERYONE is capable of losing weight, unless its a one in a million case where they have a serious genetic defect. Yes, its a lot harder for some people to lose weight, but in the end
Think of socialization this way: we see Peter Parker complain about being bullied and about not "getting" Mary Jane and such and we sympathize with him because bullying sucks. It's similar. Fat people are socialized to believe that they're less desirable, unhealthy, that they should do anything and everything possible to get smaller, etc. Peter Parker was socialized to know that his bully was the one with all the power and that he couldn't stand up for himself and he was programmed to have low self-esteem for a while. The same goes for fat people. But of course you only care about the skinny white guys.
Anyways, how do you know the average fat person's fitness routine? Despite your ignorance and denial, it is possible to be fat and healthy and eat healthy and exercise. Funnily enough, I've actually seen it in the flesh. Like I said, your bod
Also: do you not understand how the Olympics work.
Woo, that's why I said "most likely." Because it's rare for someone not to be affected by media constantly telling you that being skinny is beautiful and good while being fat is ugly and bad. Especially if you're a woman where beauty standards are heightened. It's like if the media constantly told you having six fingers is normal and fine while having five fingers is bad and abnormal, you're going to grow up insecure about your fingers and your hand if you have five fingers. Of course, it's rather the opposite in reality.
Anyways, even if they were excuses, you're right: losing weight takes a lot of work and energy and money that some people don't have. So should they spare their energy because they have to go to work, should they spend their time with their kids, should they buy the cheaper groceries that they can actually afford, or should they worry about your basic opinions? Being fat has many social complexities behind it that you're failing to see because of, I'm assuming, your privilege.
Even if they were unhealthy, why do you care? You clearly don't care about their health or else you wouldn't be shaming their bodies on the Internet and making up facts. You don't care about their well being, or (again) you wouldn't be shaming their bodies. It doesn't affect you in any way, so why do you care?
Anyways, honey, I guarantee the only reason you're calling me angry, judgmental, etc. even though my opposers are using the same kind of tone and talk, just different views, is because you disagree with me. It's pretty obvious. And if people stop listening to me because they dislike anger, then that's their anger and their immaturity getting in the way. It's not my problem if you're too shallow to listen to an angry person.
Fox News does influence the world. Not in big, obvious ways, but it influences how people (important, influential people included) think and act. So it does affect you indirectly.
And women's clothes usually accommodate smaller breasts so no shirt will really fit around them unless it's stretchy or tailored. ( I'm have problems with underwear because they looked alright on the mannequins butt and the package models butt but when I put them on they went half thong)