Boom

I'm not sure how to feel about either of those meanings.

I like the second one better....

Idk which one is worse

Or Peter Pan is Rumplestiltskin's father...

Scumbag Peter pan.

Well, apparently, Peter and all of the Lost Boys were boys that fell out of their carriages, and the only reason there weren't any girls was that girls were too clever to fall out.

*not paying attention because picture of Vinnie from Atlantis*

Too bad hook lost his hand to a crocodile

I think the second version is actually true, i read it somewhere... On the internet... There is a chance i could be false

The second version is closer to the original story of Peter Pan. Not that the lost boys grew up but if they failed to comply with Peter's demands either because they willfully did not or were physically unable to (like say gain to much weight and couldn't lose it fast enough) Peter would kill them, replace them, and forget they ever existed. Seriously. I read the original in college and it ruined Peter Pan for me.

Go read the book. Its not the same as Disney's movies. And read "The Water-Babies, A Fairy Tale for a Land Baby" It'll really mess you up.

The second one wasn't any better...

my childhood was ruined in fifth grade when robert crowne came in. its already ruined.

Oh sod off. That's plain mean to say. Why would you want to paint such a dark picture, what's the purpose? Making people sad for no reason?