I said this to my cousin and he said: "I know right, just because I'm a terrorist I cant visit my family."
"The visa lady got made because I wrote Terrorist as my job, then I told her I would do my job here"
GOD AFGHANS CAN BE SO FUNNY
DUDE WHY DOWNVOTE
IF AN AFGHAN GIRL ISNT OFFENDED BY THIS WHY SHOULD YOU GUYS ( I AM AN AFGHAN MUSLIM IF YOU GUYS DONT KNOW) man you guys are oversensitive
so all of the killing that happened in the wars that determined the boarders was imagined? There is a difference between imagining a world where everyone gets along, and creating a sustainable socioeconomic world that accounts for all of the people in the world both moral and immoral. One is a world that is unattainable until all people can be of acceptable moral character. The other is arealistic approach that recognises that some people will do bad or lazy things if there is no reason for them not to.
Not nessesarily that some are bad or lazy, but more that we are a species with vastly varying situations, beleifs, and customs that often exclude the posibility of reconciliation between different groups. Add in the factor of extemist parties with much control, or even just mild distaste for other veiw point, and any atempt at a unifying political entity is logistcally imposible.
Yeah, "acceptable moral character" is a subjective concept. Not everyone agrees on that in the first place, so even using the phrase is basically pointless.
To some extent. There are some very bad people out there that have no excuse for their behavior, but modern societies as a whole generally dont have "evil" or "good" traits. Just different ones.
"The visa lady got made because I wrote Terrorist as my job, then I told her I would do my job here"
GOD AFGHANS CAN BE SO FUNNY
IF AN AFGHAN GIRL ISNT OFFENDED BY THIS WHY SHOULD YOU GUYS ( I AM AN AFGHAN MUSLIM IF YOU GUYS DONT KNOW) man you guys are oversensitive