Am I the only one that seem to get the idea that people believe his theories just because of his disability? His theories are actually very contradicting...
I must say I agree with 'guest'. Peer reviewed work does not mean that it is applicable. His principle models might equate, but in practice it is a different story.
Most of his work isn't practical because it's in the category of theoretical physics, and his stuff on general relativity is generally very applicable. It only (relatively) recently that he's been proven outright wrong about anything. (HBP for example)
Comments