Side fact for the animal hating guest: there are 1,025,110 words in the english language. If you know less than 1,000 of them, and it's your first language, I only wonder where you were educated.
It's astonishing that a photo like this can serve to negate all data on pitbull violence. I have had three friends and one brother mauled by pitbulls, each within a two year span, one friend had to have her face sewn back on. Another woman down the road from us had her baby eaten alive in his crib by their pit while the mother was taking a nap. Do your homework. These are not safe animals. Yeah yeah I know Cesar has a God complex and likes to blame intelligent humans for an animal's inbred, aggressive nature, but Cesar's a dick and a sociopath who's own wife and kids abandoned. IT'S THE DOG'S FAULT. IT'S AN ANIMAL. IT DOESN'T SPEAK OR WRITE PHILOSOPHY. IT ONLE EATS AND HAS SEX. PITBULLS CAN BE SPONTANEOUSLY DEADLY EVEN WITH A GREAT AND LIVING HOME. Wake up!!
You are literally too stupid to insult. You wanna know how humans make the pitbulls aggressive? Well there are a number of options!
1. Whipping.
2. Thumbtacks in their paws.
3. Tying it up and starving it.
4. ENCOURAGING THEM WHEN THEY ATTACK OTHER HUMANS, EVEN IF THOSE HUMANS ARE JUST INNOCENT BYSTANDERS.
So no, dogs can't write poetry or understand philosophy, but they aren't aggressive unless humans encourage it.
Phoenix, You must really hate statistics and medical facts, and reality in general. You have made alot of emotional shock statements with no personal experience to add. You're saying that anyone's pitbullI that is aggressive, its owners MUST be torturing it. So you want to accuse everyone whose dog is acting like an instictual animal of horriffic abuse, even though you have no data to rely on. So now we're having the animal owner Inquisition that relies on medieval divination to determine guilt. Well that reasoning is a load of used rubbers. What you just said will never stand up in courts of law worldwide. Facts about how the dog behaves do, medical statistics and scientific studies do. Secondly, you still sound like Cesar, all feelings no facts. Just verbal flash-shock. I already mentioned that all those families were loving, pro-pit homes. Why can't you understand that a pit bull was bred to kill, and was never meant as a companion animal? phoenix's Salem animal abuse witch trials!
I guess according to you, that little girl I knew deserved to have her face torn off by her doggie for feeding it some cheese. And maybe that little baby that got eaten, my FRIEND'S BABY, according to your reason, got eaten by a pit they had raised from a puppy because the owners just liked to torture it because pheonix says so. You are seriously one very cold person.
It's even more cold to judge an entire breed based off statistics. If you raise the dog properly, it will not eat a baby. I know one pit that wouldn't bite you even if you took his food away and put your hand in his mouth while you did it. I know of another that tore apart a yorkie while both owners were there. The pit owner claimed the little dog was asking for it. In my experience, it's ALWAYS the owner/trainer and NEVER the breed.
See? There one of you go again with your divination/witchcraft "if---then" pseudo-reasoning. I just said the homes were loving. But all you people have to say is "the dog him is mean to people hurted hims I am factor the knowing guy"! Why are dogs worth more to you than babies?! You're still blaming THE BABY! Belligierence is its own reward. Your lives must be full to bursting with self righteusness
You say that pitbulls were bred to be killers, you do know most dogs are killers by nature right? And it is true that it's the owers fault. Dogs exist because a long time ago certain wolves teamed up with humans to hunt more efficiently. They were friendly and cooperative. That's their instinct. If a dog is behaving bad it's because they have gone through rough times making them more aggressive and defensive. You talk about statistics and how all pitbulls are like that. Have you thought about the possibility that people who wants a fierce dog happens to choose the pitbull breed? No? In that case you need learn how to look beyond the mere numbers. You are the ignorant one here.
I'm not blaming the baby, or the dog. I'm blaming the owner/trainer of the dog. The dog should be put down if it can't be controlled, but to blame the dog and not also blame the owner/trainer is shameful.
Your experience is not documented casework concerning the negative encounters with the dogs. Mine are because of the legal battles that ensued over those families' losses. Either way if a breed of dog is so temperamental that you need a PhD just to own one, then the breed needs to be exterminated. Now here comes more junior high emotional justifications and verbal abuse from pitbull owners with 1000-word vocabularies...
Other animals kill babies too. Should every animal that kills someone be entirely eradicated from the planet? That's how your argument is currently formulated. Also, you don't need a PHD, you just need to know how to train a dog.
And another point; If your views on animals is as such, what do you feel we should do with those babies who grow up to be murderers and rapists? Or their parents, or their children? Should we start killing babies when they start exhibiting tendencies of psychopathy?
Dog-hating guest, as unintelligible an argument as this is, GO FUCK YOURSELF! Someone has provided you with an obvious case proving not all pitbulls are like that and you are so pig-headed you've chosen to discount it entirely!
1. Whipping.
2. Thumbtacks in their paws.
3. Tying it up and starving it.
4. ENCOURAGING THEM WHEN THEY ATTACK OTHER HUMANS, EVEN IF THOSE HUMANS ARE JUST INNOCENT BYSTANDERS.
So no, dogs can't write poetry or understand philosophy, but they aren't aggressive unless humans encourage it.