What if the things the sontarens used in "The Poison Sky" which make bullets expand inside their magazines rendering bullet based weapons useless are invented?
Then what would stop people from using it against the civilian populace? A good idea, but I'm not eager to give someone the power to decide whose guns fire and whose don't
I once commented on a post like this, that if guns were not the problem, why there were so many gun victims in the usa and so many less in countries with stricter gun control. One guy actually replied that there are so many stabbings in other countries. What I mean is: you cannot argue with someone who is refusing to realize the obvious facts. This is pretty much the same as arguing with a crack addict while he sucks dick for the next rock, and tell him to change his ways.
Edit: Nearly took that bait and posted: "And that is where?" - for you to post me sites of gun lobby financed sites that "prove" your point. Same kind of "logic" like the "scientists" who are sceptical of climate change. Keep chewing that d.
The us has alot of people, i beleive 3rd or 4th most. Obviously we will have the most bad people cuz we have more people in general. When you make gun control, you limit the protection of the people. Criminals buy guns on the black market so banning them wont do anything
Cmon... of course I was talking ratio. USA has 320 mio citizens, more than 30,000 killed by guns a year. The EU has 500 million with about 1000 killed by guns. Germany has some 80 mio citizens, some 60 people killed by guns, UK rates are a fraction of even these lower figures. Theres a list on wikipedia, "Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year". Not many counties have higher rates than the us, and all those countries are more or less lawless shitholes. Closest number is Mexico. Fucking narco state Mex-i-co... as I said: complete fact allergy. Smoke that gun pipe all you want, its some lethal shit.
Of course a country with legal gun ownership would have more gun deaths.
But pray tell, how many armed civilians helped fight the terrorists in Paris? How often can British citizens scare off a mugger with their .38 snubnose? What are the rates for crimes committed using blunt or sharp objects in Europe? I'm pretty sure that more than makes up the difference.
61% of that 30000 is suicide. But let's put up scary numbers and make guns look bad when obviously the issue lies more than just with firearms. Let's all blatantly ignore mental health and stability because your type wants to push your agenda on the poor souls we lose.
Famousone: "Of course a country with legal gun ownership would have more gun deaths" - you are aware that the NRA would not exactly approve of that statement? And how successful are your "armed civilians" in preventing the mass shooting incidents that happen more than once a day? Guns get people killed - period.
Guest: 61% of 300000 are as dead as the other 39%. Also, as the US suicide rate is 30% over the german and about twice the UK rate, you might argue that theres more sucides with better access to guns. Even if you count them out, the US got soo many more casualties than the rest of the civilized world. Also the death rate per 100,000 population is based on the same conditions for all the countries.
"let me just ignore the facts at hand to point out a lost soul is a lost soul but still blame solely the guns and completely and sickeningly ignore mental health and stability." also, these shootings are mostly happening in gun free zones and or States with a lot of restrictions. Lmfao I really shouldn't feed you, but you're a bad troll 0/10 go back to your bridge please xD what would I know though, I like guns so I'm a bad person and obviously a ignorant racist hick by your logic xD
Ah, after all those eloquent ad hominem "arguments" you use this tiny little word "logic. Care to explain then, why the firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year in the US is so much higher than in all other western countries, when the suicide rate is just a little higher? And while taking this answer out of wherever you gunheads find your arguments, don't hurt yourself with Occam's razor.
Sad troll is sad. Still ignores mental health. Still ignores population. I realize you're going off per capita, but when you have more people, you have more crime. Crime is not linear. You're worse than main stream media lol
ok just because I'm not dumb enough to buy into your anti-gun agenda I support Trump? Good luck making it in the real world where no one is gonna blindly follow your bullshit and hand over their guns.
Youre dumb enough to buy into your own bullshit, that makes you the classic Trump voter.
Famousone: compared to carson Trump is even kind of sane. Actually I would prefer a reckless self absorbed asshole like Trump to a batshit crazy creep like Carson. That guy really needs help.
But pray tell, how many armed civilians helped fight the terrorists in Paris? How often can British citizens scare off a mugger with their .38 snubnose? What are the rates for crimes committed using blunt or sharp objects in Europe? I'm pretty sure that more than makes up the difference.
Guest: 61% of 300000 are as dead as the other 39%. Also, as the US suicide rate is 30% over the german and about twice the UK rate, you might argue that theres more sucides with better access to guns. Even if you count them out, the US got soo many more casualties than the rest of the civilized world. Also the death rate per 100,000 population is based on the same conditions for all the countries.
Carson.
Famousone: compared to carson Trump is even kind of sane. Actually I would prefer a reckless self absorbed asshole like Trump to a batshit crazy creep like Carson. That guy really needs help.
We should do it again sometime.