Who am I to deny someone a good laugh.
Besides, if these lies turn out to be true in only one generation we will still be here, and anyone laughing will have to be deranged.
PS. Terrorism is kinda real. Hundreds of innocent people are being murdered every month. Seems like something to worry about to me
So-called climate change has not been proven. There are only computer models and forecasts that may or may not happen in the future. Seems like a back burner kinda thing to me.
Terrorism is here and now. Climate change is in the future if at all. Seems like one of these things might be a little more pressing.
Can you please stop your sad monologue? Yes, terrorism is real, but so is climate change and pollution (as shown in the picture). Climate change is about more than just the rising temperature, it's about rainforests being cut down, causing CO2 emissions, animal species going extinct, it's about pollution in the ocean and our air, it's about caring for the planet we live in and want to be living in. Terrorism kills, but so do pesticides, air and water pollution - no war needed to go against climate change
@guesthouse climate change is pure physics and chemistry. It is proven in many ways. For example the temperature has gone up more in the last 100 years than it has in the recorded history of mankind. Denying it is just being ignorant.
As a matter of record, yes "climate change" is real. Hell, if it wasn't the dinosaurs would still be running free. The climate is cyclical; it changes, hence the multiple ice ages and warming ages.
No, man-made global warming is not real. The only "evidence" is computer models, which have been repeatedly shown to be wrong.
Do you really think the cave men burned fossil fuels until the climate warmed and the glaciers receded? For that matter, what did they do to cause the ice ages? And if you say that was natural, why in hell can't anything that may be happening now be natural???
And you are also quite wrong about the temperature rising. The earth actually warmed more in the middle ages than the last century.
▼
deleted
· 8 years ago
In the United States in 2014, nearly 40% of the power was from coal. The dirtiest and most primitive form of power available. When you burn coal, it's incomplete combustion. That means it releases tons of nasty shit into the air. And it is being burned for power constantly. Still don't believe me? Riddle me this, simpleton. Did the air look like this a thousand years ago? Humans sure as hell existed, but we didn't have the power usage.
http://ei.marketwatch.com//Multimedia/2013/02/03/Photos/MG/MW-AY912_China__20130203225049_MG.jpg?uuid=1c7fa034-6e7e-11e2-a22f-002128040cf6
It's true coal is a dirty form of power, I don't think anyone is denying that. But when you look at how much Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, and the various types of CFCs, that are in the atmosphere, which is 370,000 parts per billion in the atmosphere, only 12k parts per billion is man-made. So only about 0.28% of that is caused by man-made. Now this is of course in the general whole of the atmosphere. Its a lot cleaner in areas that are further from power plants/high density populations and much worse closer to those.
There's a difference between temperature cycling and temperature rising by several degrees in under 100 years. I'm terrible sorry for the poor education you obviously have received, guestwho.
Insults definitely help your case. Is that what a great education teaches you? I guess I had a poor education after all; I was taught to debate on points, not to put down my opponent when I couldn't score with ideas.
I was also taught to differentiate between pollution and climate. Dirty air in China does not lead to the death of the planet. But I had a terrible education.
And you've succeeded in missing my point; who caused climate change before we were here? Of course, you probably did answer and I'm too poorly educated to understand.
Perhaps I should sue my teachers for making me such a simpleton.
▼
deleted
· 8 years ago
You think that climate (temperature and weather patterns) is equal to smog?
Carbondioxide reflects light back on to the earth instead of letting it out into space. The more carbondioxide there is in the air the more it will reflect. That leads to the heating of the planet. The reason more carbon affects the earth is because the carbondioxide we create has been bound in oil for millions of years. That means we're letting out more than the current earth is used to, and so fast that it can't adapt like it has before.
Were smarter than you YOU BELIEVE CLIMATE CHANGE IS A MYTH AND YOUR SAYING THAT WERE STUPIDER THAN YOU also i quote "Still with the insults? I'd like to think you're smarter than that." therefore stating insults are dumb even though you just said "You are what you eat, dick! Ha!!" Which is an insult.
But I feel bad for you
It must suck having only one set of grandparents
No it wasn't an insult, hence the "ha!". Average intelligence should tell you that was a joke.
I present evidence of my position, you merely call me names. I'm afraid the real world doesn't work that way. Stick to tumblr if that's the closest you can come to human-like communication.
I do not see how the "ha!" justifies your "joke" as an actual joke. Also, I'm insulting because I just don't care. I just like to laugh at stupid people and see how they struggle to come up with logical explanation to an illogical opinion.
At what point did I accuse you of not understanding sarcasm? I just accused you of lacking human empathy in equating the arguments for population control (i.e., maybe humans should shepherd resources, including their own reproduction, more carefully so that millions of humans don't end up living in squalor and/or dying) with saying that millions of humans should die.
Where is your proof? How can it be obvious when the alarmists themselves always say things are going to happen in the future?
What the hell ever happened to critical thinking?!?!?
One can find anything online. Doesn't mean it's real.
When I see these politicians and researchers being given millions of dollars for climate change research and various related reasons it makes me wonder if it's not all about the Benjamins.
When I see the email scandal at East Anglia in the UK I wonder if it's not all about some hidden agenda.
When I see that 16 Democrat attorneys general are putting together an Inquisition to criminally prosecute businesses that dare to say climate change isn't real it makes me wonder if it's not all about absolute power.
When I see Ottmar Edenhofer of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change say that this is not about climate change at all, but is about redistribution of wealth, well, I just have to wonder if we may be getting fucked on a global scale!
They are changing the climate, geoengineering they admit it they claim that it is used to offset the effects of climate change... they are telling you right there they are manipulating the weather but for"good"!
I actually wrote a paper on climate change and if it's happening and to what degree and what it could mean in the future. Yes the earth has climate changes in that it has warm and cold periods, Just like seasons. If you look at time magazine and other popular, but less than scientific magazines and newspapers and government lobbyists, they all thought the world was going to freeze in the 60s and 70s. And guess what in the 30s and 40s we had heat spells and droughts across North America and also much of Africa and Europe. Not only that but guess what happened in the 1880s and 1890s, they had cold spells all across the Americas and European continent.
I did a little bit, but I could not find any reliable scientific peer reviewed papers on those claims. Only the claims that the agencies themselves put out that no one else was able to corroborate.
There is just so much we don't understand about weather patterns that it is hard to prove some things with scientific evidence to back it up. And these groups that say they have changed the weather, how can you prove it when 1. you don't give anyone any hard evidence or facts, you just make the claim and 2. You have to know exactly what the weather was going to be ahead of time so you can say for a fact you changed it.
Exactly why I have my doubts. Also when they say EVERYTHING that happens or doesn't happen is because of global warming?
If we have rain it's because of global warming; drought? Global warming. Hurricane? Global warming. Slow hurricane season? That damn global warming again!
It is just not possible that every single variation in weather is caused by global warming.
I don't have the facts im front of me but the people in the lab do even if they were in front of your face you'd pull some shit out of your ass about there are too many variables to prove , what they are claming ,https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_modification..... there more information out there
No I'm stating there a group of people who are manipulating the weather ...... if the have the capability to do just that ..how do we know it is for good ..
Evidence: 2015 was the hottest year since forever. Glaciers are melting. Not just a few, but lots of them. It's simple science that carbon emissions cause heating. There's lots of evidence that I even mentioned before, but apparently you don't want to hear it. Too bad I guess.
In fact, no. Quite wrong. There is record ice at the poles. There has been no warming in nearly 20 years. Any effects of co2 have been greatly exaggerated. Literally every dire prediction from the alarmists has failed to come true. In the 80s it was said we had ten years to fix it or we would all die. In the 90s it was said we had ten years to fix it or we would all die. Now they're talking 30 or more years out to give themselves more cover. The only "evidence" is computer simulations and time after time it has been proven the data has been manipulated. The founder of the Weather Channel has called bullshit. Hundreds of top scientists have agreed.
NASA? Really? The space agency that Obama put in charge of Muslim outreach is supposed to be climate experts too?
Actually NASA has contradicted itself on climate more than once. Also, I don't trust anyone that gets paid for what they say. Follow the money.
Ok, so that means every source is unreliable. Also: when have they contradicted themselves? At least give me what you call "reliable" sources (aka all sources that support your idea). If not, then you can get the fuck out of my face and take your stupidity with you.
I'm nowhere near your face.
I'm not going to argue "reliable sources" with you because your opinion is obviously that any dissent from the established dogma is bullshit. Even if we simply take it a face value- the research is real and valid- how do you square the fact that every single weather phenomenon is blamed on global warming? How about the fact that the alarmists always want us to pay more taxes? Or the fact that they refuse to push China or India to clean up their act? Just use a little critical thinking and it becomes obvious that there are people with ulterior motives pushing this agenda.
I don't believe that every weather phenomenon is caused by global warming, however it is there and heating up the globe. Also I don't live in the USA and out taxes aren't raised because someone says it's for global warming. I don't live in a state filled with propaganda. Sorry but your arguments about that are invalid here. How come the majority of every scientist in that field believes in global warming? Do you seriously think that the science elitists are wrong? I'm terribly sorry if you honestly think that everyone who tells you something that you can't see are being paid to do so in someone elses interest.
Perhaps you do not believe every weather phenomenon is caused by global warming, but the alarmists do. Those that you believe do. For example, when we have snow they say global warming is causing the extreme weather. If we have a dry winter they say global warming is causing the extreme weather. If we have a warm spring they say global warming is causing the extreme weather. If we have a cold spring they say global warming is causing the extreme weather. Apparently we didn't have weather at all until the last half of the 20th century when global warming was invented.
As to the taxes, it doesn't matter where you live because this is a UN pet project too. The United Nations is pushing this on a global scale, and their endgame is more taxes and redistribution of the world's wealth.
First of all, they're not saying that. That's such a hyperbole. However they take notice when a country that should not experience 30C°+ does. But sure, Mr. Tinfoil hat, you're totally right about everything. Your uneducated opinion must be true when it goes against the majority of every scientist since the 20th century. Also I still don't think the taxes in my country will go up because of that. We already have high taxes that partially fund scientists. Argument still invalid.
Even assuming I'd read the last dear lord how long have you two been arguing anyway number of posts, and none of his arguments held any validity, that would still be a clear case of Argument from Fallacy.
That fact that you're wrong claims otherwise. Your statement is like North Korea stating they're the best country in the world, which is stupid...
Also claiming victory solely on that makes no sense whatsoever.
Besides, if these lies turn out to be true in only one generation we will still be here, and anyone laughing will have to be deranged.
So-called climate change has not been proven. There are only computer models and forecasts that may or may not happen in the future. Seems like a back burner kinda thing to me.
Terrorism is here and now. Climate change is in the future if at all. Seems like one of these things might be a little more pressing.
No, man-made global warming is not real. The only "evidence" is computer models, which have been repeatedly shown to be wrong.
Do you really think the cave men burned fossil fuels until the climate warmed and the glaciers receded? For that matter, what did they do to cause the ice ages? And if you say that was natural, why in hell can't anything that may be happening now be natural???
And you are also quite wrong about the temperature rising. The earth actually warmed more in the middle ages than the last century.
http://ei.marketwatch.com//Multimedia/2013/02/03/Photos/MG/MW-AY912_China__20130203225049_MG.jpg?uuid=1c7fa034-6e7e-11e2-a22f-002128040cf6
I was also taught to differentiate between pollution and climate. Dirty air in China does not lead to the death of the planet. But I had a terrible education.
And you've succeeded in missing my point; who caused climate change before we were here? Of course, you probably did answer and I'm too poorly educated to understand.
Perhaps I should sue my teachers for making me such a simpleton.
But I feel bad for you
It must suck having only one set of grandparents
I present evidence of my position, you merely call me names. I'm afraid the real world doesn't work that way. Stick to tumblr if that's the closest you can come to human-like communication.
.
.
.
Kinda seems you may not be clear on the concept of sarcasm after all.
What the hell ever happened to critical thinking?!?!?
When I see these politicians and researchers being given millions of dollars for climate change research and various related reasons it makes me wonder if it's not all about the Benjamins.
When I see the email scandal at East Anglia in the UK I wonder if it's not all about some hidden agenda.
When I see that 16 Democrat attorneys general are putting together an Inquisition to criminally prosecute businesses that dare to say climate change isn't real it makes me wonder if it's not all about absolute power.
When I see Ottmar Edenhofer of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change say that this is not about climate change at all, but is about redistribution of wealth, well, I just have to wonder if we may be getting fucked on a global scale!
Lalalalalala
If we have rain it's because of global warming; drought? Global warming. Hurricane? Global warming. Slow hurricane season? That damn global warming again!
It is just not possible that every single variation in weather is caused by global warming.
Yeah, because NASA has totally got it all wrong. It's not like we can trust an organization filled with scientists.
Actually NASA has contradicted itself on climate more than once. Also, I don't trust anyone that gets paid for what they say. Follow the money.
I'm not going to argue "reliable sources" with you because your opinion is obviously that any dissent from the established dogma is bullshit. Even if we simply take it a face value- the research is real and valid- how do you square the fact that every single weather phenomenon is blamed on global warming? How about the fact that the alarmists always want us to pay more taxes? Or the fact that they refuse to push China or India to clean up their act? Just use a little critical thinking and it becomes obvious that there are people with ulterior motives pushing this agenda.
As to the taxes, it doesn't matter where you live because this is a UN pet project too. The United Nations is pushing this on a global scale, and their endgame is more taxes and redistribution of the world's wealth.
Also claiming victory solely on that makes no sense whatsoever.