"This is why you never cite Wikipedia as a source." - yea, unless you got half a brain at least, do a tiny little bit of research aside of wikipedia (i.e. the sources of an aricle) and apply a little common sense. So yea, some people really should not cite wikipedia as a source...
.
Using the above extraordinary master skills, it appears the whole thing is a fake, so maybe you shouldn't use funsubstance as source for criticizing wikipedia...
You know that wikipedia is not like an encyclopedia, right? That it's interactive and people are actively discussing its content? Is it a recommended SINGLE source of information? Probably not. So?
@funsubstanceuser okay then?
You know that I'm just joking right?
I don't understand why I can't make a joke without you flipping the fuck out and saying "don't do this because x and y". Fuck that.
"How would I be triggered if I made the joke and you responded?" - keep telling yourself that Mr. "@funsubstanceuser okay then? You know that I'm just joking right? I don't understand why I can't make a joke without you flipping the fuck out and saying "don't do this because x and y". Fuck that." ... uhm... ok? Why so eppy? When I was clearly just poking pokey, you felt oh so lured to play victim. Don't you wish now you'd just shut up?
You're not supposed to do anything but when its clearly you who got super triggered in the first place, maybe that's not what you should try and tease others with. Unless you wanna look like helluva dope. In this case: Check.
.
Hm... maybe you really don't get it... ok, just because my reply is under your post, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm answering to your post. In my first posting in this thread I didn't.
I got triggered? No, me and @pokethebear were having a right old laugh (or really just me since I responded) and then you butt into the conversation and got angry because people who cite Wikipedia are apparently extremely unintelligent.
If you were replying to user @pokethebear, here's an idea. Come closer. Right there. How about you use the @ symbol and reference him immediately? Y'know, the feature that has been on this website for at least a week now and everyone uses it? Because if you reply to me and don't discern me from him, I'm going to assume you're talking to me unless spoken otherwise.
No. It's the fact that two people had already started a conversation, then you reply directly to me, but don't say whether you're talking to me or not, then say I'm triggered when you don't elaborate who you're talking to. Am i supposed to just know you meant him?
I left and went into the mountains for 3 days with no cell service or wifi. I came back and you guys are still going at it. Reminds me of the time Homer put a cat and a dog in a burlap sack and tried to breed them.
.
Using the above extraordinary master skills, it appears the whole thing is a fake, so maybe you shouldn't use funsubstance as source for criticizing wikipedia...
You know that I'm just joking right?
I don't understand why I can't make a joke without you flipping the fuck out and saying "don't do this because x and y". Fuck that.
.
Hm... maybe you really don't get it... ok, just because my reply is under your post, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm answering to your post. In my first posting in this thread I didn't.
If you were replying to user @pokethebear, here's an idea. Come closer. Right there. How about you use the @ symbol and reference him immediately? Y'know, the feature that has been on this website for at least a week now and everyone uses it? Because if you reply to me and don't discern me from him, I'm going to assume you're talking to me unless spoken otherwise.
Note: I just had a look and they've changed it back :(