Yea, bullshit. Just do a pic search on those. Someone who believes shit like that without checking it should get a high current shock from his keyboard or touchscreen any time s/he writes "main stream media".
Didn't see it on BBC News, nor ITV News, nor Facebook, nor yahoo, google news, 5 news, or Daily Mail, The guardian.
It might've been there, and I could've missed it, but then again, if its that easy to miss, how heavily publicised must it have been?
Ok, so we're from "haven't been published" to "could have missed it". Next thing you should be working on is to accept your bias. You won't find what you're not looking for. Did you do the pic search I recommended? No, you didn't. And further to your media and news competence: it goes to show by listing Fuckbook, Yahoo and Google as news resources.
A young man who knows his purpose in life is a nice thing to see nowadays.
.
You're wrong though, its only the over 50s and the very, very daft young folks who think Facebook is a news source.
The facebook algorithm will decide which BBC news articles you get to see, based on FB policies and the choices you and your peer group have made on facebook. It's not a proper news platform.
This has got nothing to do with my personal opinion. An algorithm with the purpose of showing you what you prefer to see will by definition constrict your perception. Which is exactly the opposite of what a news source should do.
No. Because, I can click their feed, and see all news links, thus being able to see all related stories without the news links.
And even then, their algorithm would still be showing me news, it just might not be news in your opinion
It might've been there, and I could've missed it, but then again, if its that easy to miss, how heavily publicised must it have been?
.
You're wrong though, its only the over 50s and the very, very daft young folks who think Facebook is a news source.
And even then, their algorithm would still be showing me news, it just might not be news in your opinion