I guess destroying this planet is more important than exploring new ones
8 years ago by zentonight · 1389 Likes · 10 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
inyourendo
· 8 years ago
· FIRST
If there was an alien ship that was prepared to attack earth, I imagine, that would make those numbers shift.
6
trustnthngmulder
· 8 years ago
There IS NO SUCH A THING as HUMAN colony. Or human space stations, or human astronaut. There's American, Russian, British. So will the colonies be. And I don't wanna imagine if USA colonizes Europa (satellite) and Russians take Eo. They don't deploy nukes now, cause they'll harm themselves too, when they're on separate planets, there's no such a worry. And if we share one, well, you know what happened. We'll need nukes even when we find "other earth". That's why Arms first NASA second.
▼
willfree
· 8 years ago
Those are some really interesting points you make
▼
trustnthngmulder
· 8 years ago
We all dream of a safer world. But it's just a dream, at least for century or two. I mean Piccard from Star Trek is native English speaker native of (something that used to be called) France. Or, remember PortuGreek from that movie Sea world or something... Haha. We can't keep microstates like Montenegro and Kosovo together,let alone Human World republic...
▼
·
Edited 8 years ago
guest
· 7 years ago
Issue is, half of these arms are being used the way Americans ask the government to NOT use them.
ogchucknorris
· 8 years ago
The budget isn't to destroy the planet it's to stop other people from destroying it before we get the chance to explore
2
frozen_chick123
· 7 years ago
Logic
▼
thatswhatshesaid
· 8 years ago
Why do people always hate on the military budget?? If we did not have a strong military to prevent others from attacking us, we would not have any money to spend on NASA
2
hissssssssss
· 7 years ago
There's no habitable planets that we have even close to enough technogy to get to
2
demibee
· 7 years ago
Umm, the other stuff is pretty far away?